Re: (make-pathname :name "/root") - good/bad?
- From: Christophe Rhodes <csr21@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 10:02:47 +0100
Geoffrey King <lordergeoffrey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
In LispWorks:
(make-pathname :name "root") ; --> #p"root"
(make-pathname :name "/root") ; --> #p"/root"
In CLISP (windows):
(make-pathname :name "root") ; --> #p"root"
(make-pathname :name "/root") ; --> error
Which is the correct behaviour?
They are both correct.
Christophe
.
- References:
- (make-pathname :name "/root") - good/bad?
- From: Geoffrey King
- (make-pathname :name "/root") - good/bad?
- Prev by Date: Re: What language will be used to write the first self aware program?
- Next by Date: Re: Recovering from an exception
- Previous by thread: (make-pathname :name "/root") - good/bad?
- Next by thread: Re: (make-pathname :name "/root") - good/bad?
- Index(es):
