Re: Real multithreaded Lisp?
- From: Dmitry Gorbatovsky <fincomus@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 22:19:34 +0300
Peter Seibel wrote:
"Sascha Matzke" <sascha.matzke@xxxxxxxxx> writes:I also have interest in Scieneer(TM) implementation.
Hi,
is there any Lisp implementation which is really multithreaded (os
level) for Sun Solaris?
I have a Sun T2000 here for evaluation and would like to try out
something "lispy" besides the normal Java work-related stuff.
I already tested AllegroCL which doesn't support os-threads under Unix
- so having 16 virtual / 4 physical CPUs doesn't really made a
difference. The test maxed out at 6.25% CPU usage (one of the sixteen
available CPUs).
You might check out:
<http://www.scieneer.com/scl/index.html>>
I've never used them but their claim to fame seems to be support for
SMP threading.
-Peter
So maybe some one outthere would be so kind
to share an experience.
cheers
.
- References:
- Real multithreaded Lisp?
- From: Sascha Matzke
- Re: Real multithreaded Lisp?
- From: Peter Seibel
- Real multithreaded Lisp?
- Prev by Date: Re: Common Lisp implementations are still multiple times slower than C
- Next by Date: Re: Common Lisp implementations are still multiple times slower than C
- Previous by thread: Re: Real multithreaded Lisp?
- Next by thread: Re: Real multithreaded Lisp?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|