Re: How Common Lisp sucks
- From: Bill Atkins <NOatkinwSPAM@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 11:44:01 -0400
Ron Garret <rNOSPAMon@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
In article <87irp30xjj.fsf@xxxxxxx>, Bill Atkins <NOatkinwSPAM@xxxxxxx>
wrote:
I view this whole situation as somewhat analogous to the state of
Linux.
Except that Linux has a process for managing change, which IMO
contributes significantly to its success.
rg
If you are referring to the kernel proper, then yes. But if you are
referring to the operating system created by a distro, then there is
no central control except the distro's.
--
"...and when, another time, I discovered that he considered not
unworthy of reflection in one of those mirrors of absolute truth which
were his writings a remark similar to one which I had had occasion to
make about our friend M. Legrandin, ...then it was suddenly revealed
to me that my own humble existence and the realms of the true were
less widely separated than I had supposed, that at certain points they
actually collided, and in my newfound confidence and joy, I had wept
upon his printed page as in the arms of a long-lost father."
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: How Common Lisp sucks
- From: Ron Garret
- Re: How Common Lisp sucks
- References:
- How Common Lisp sucks
- From: Ron Garret
- Re: How Common Lisp sucks
- From: Bill Atkins
- Re: How Common Lisp sucks
- From: Ron Garret
- How Common Lisp sucks
- Prev by Date: Re: format reference
- Next by Date: Re: format reference
- Previous by thread: Re: How Common Lisp sucks
- Next by thread: Re: How Common Lisp sucks
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
