Re: How Common Lisp sucks
- From: Pascal Costanza <pc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 10:03:41 +0200
Ron Garret wrote:
However, maybe this does raise a possibility for addressing some of
your original concerns, namely making CL as accessible as python, perl
or even (gasp) Java. Why not put together a CL specific Linux
distribution. It could be based on Debian (as Debian already has
really quite nice support for CL.
Not a bad idea.
Lisp in a box is a step in that direction, no?
See http://www.gigamonkeys.com/book/lispbox/ and http://common-lisp.net/project/lispbox/
Pascal
--
3rd European Lisp Workshop
July 3-4 - Nantes, France - co-located with ECOOP 2006
http://lisp-ecoop06.bknr.net/
.
- References:
- How Common Lisp sucks
- From: Ron Garret
- Re: How Common Lisp sucks
- From: Bill Atkins
- Re: How Common Lisp sucks
- From: Ron Garret
- Re: How Common Lisp sucks
- From: Bill Atkins
- Re: How Common Lisp sucks
- From: Ron Garret
- Re: How Common Lisp sucks
- From: Tim Bradshaw
- Re: How Common Lisp sucks
- From: Ron Garret
- Re: How Common Lisp sucks
- From: Ari Johnson
- Re: How Common Lisp sucks
- From: Ron Garret
- Re: How Common Lisp sucks
- From: Tim X
- Re: How Common Lisp sucks
- From: Ron Garret
- How Common Lisp sucks
- Prev by Date: Re: Common Lisp rocks
- Next by Date: Re: How Common Lisp sucks
- Previous by thread: Re: How Common Lisp sucks
- Next by thread: Re: How Common Lisp sucks
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|