Re: Portable Allegroserve and SBCL

Ari Johnson <iamtheari@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

I'm trying to give Webactions from Portable Allegroserve 1.2.35 a
shot, and I got it to run on OpenMCL 1.0 with very few hassles (just
had to add some nicknames to acl-compat packages), but I would like
to be able to run it on SBCL. I happen to run Debian sarge on the

I haven't tried Portable Allegroserve/Webactions under SBCL, but I've
had it running (with CLSQL) under CMUCL for quite some time.

Petter

--
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Portable Allegroserve and SBCL
    ... and I got it to run on OpenMCL 1.0 with very few hassles (just ... had to add some nicknames to acl-compat packages), ... which means that I have SBCL 0.8.16. ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)
  • Re: Portable Allegroserve and SBCL
    ... had to add some nicknames to acl-compat packages), ... I happen to run Debian sarge on the ... which means that I have SBCL 0.8.16. ... Installing a local copy of sbcl on a Debian Sarge system with ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)