Re: possibly silly question re quoting of function arguments...
- From: keke@xxxxxxx (Takehiko Abe)
- Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 12:49:44 +0900
Thomas A. Russ wrote:
As Peter Seibel notes, though, there is most likely a better way to do
this.
I agree. However, I think there are a few interesting points
to learn by analyzing more why his code didn't work --that's
more interesting than getting "a better way".
.
- References:
- possibly silly question re quoting of function arguments...
- From: birlinn@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: possibly silly question re quoting of function arguments...
- From: Peter Seibel
- Re: possibly silly question re quoting of function arguments...
- From: birlinn@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: possibly silly question re quoting of function arguments...
- From: Peter Seibel
- Re: possibly silly question re quoting of function arguments...
- From: Takehiko Abe
- Re: possibly silly question re quoting of function arguments...
- From: Thomas A. Russ
- possibly silly question re quoting of function arguments...
- Prev by Date: Re: Decreasing the "standard deviation" of lisp
- Next by Date: Re: How Common Lisp sucks
- Previous by thread: Re: possibly silly question re quoting of function arguments...
- Next by thread: Re: possibly silly question re quoting of function arguments...
- Index(es):