Re: which LISP implementation (goal explained)
- From: Marco Baringer <mb@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 12:31:05 +0200
"david.tolpin@xxxxxxxxx" <david.tolpin@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
Make sure you can compile and run your code with at least two of them.
Keep in mind that SBCL is still not of production quality and somewhat
buggy.
this is completly untrue, in my experience.
--
-Marco
Ring the bells that still can ring.
Forget the perfect offering.
There is a crack in everything.
That's how the light gets in.
-Leonard Cohen
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: which LISP implementation (goal explained)
- From: david.tolpin@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: which LISP implementation (goal explained)
- References:
- which LISP implementation (goal explained)
- From: arnuld
- Re: which LISP implementation (goal explained)
- From: david.tolpin@xxxxxxxxx
- which LISP implementation (goal explained)
- Prev by Date: Re: which LISP implementation (goal explained)
- Next by Date: Re: which LISP implementation (goal explained)
- Previous by thread: Re: which LISP implementation (goal explained)
- Next by thread: Re: which LISP implementation (goal explained)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|