Re: which LISP implementation (goal explained)
- From: "david.tolpin@xxxxxxxxx" <david.tolpin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 Apr 2006 04:35:45 -0700
Marco Baringer wrote:
"david.tolpin@xxxxxxxxx" <david.tolpin@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
Make sure you can compile and run your code with at least two of them.
Keep in mind that SBCL is still not of production quality and somewhat
buggy.
this is completly untrue, in my experience.
Hi Marco,
what is untrue, that it makes sense to make sure that the code runs
under two implementations?
or that SBCL is not yet production-quality?
David
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: which LISP implementation (goal explained)
- From: Marco Baringer
- Re: which LISP implementation (goal explained)
- References:
- which LISP implementation (goal explained)
- From: arnuld
- Re: which LISP implementation (goal explained)
- From: david.tolpin@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: which LISP implementation (goal explained)
- From: Marco Baringer
- which LISP implementation (goal explained)
- Prev by Date: Re: which LISP implementation (goal explained)
- Next by Date: Re: which LISP implementation (goal explained)
- Previous by thread: Re: which LISP implementation (goal explained)
- Next by thread: Re: which LISP implementation (goal explained)
- Index(es):