Re: which LISP implementation (goal explained)
- From: Marco Baringer <mb@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 15:09:56 +0200
"arnuld" <arnuld3@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
well, between your *discussion*, i am missing the information i need.
web apps have been developed, successfully, on sbcl, cmucl and
clisp. there have also been failures using all three. personally i'd
suggest to use sbcl or cmucl on linux (unlike clisp those two have
threads), however clisp runs on windows (sbcl's windows support is
still under development) if that's important to you.
if there's a particular web framework you want to use it may not
support all implementations, this should help to limit your choices.
--
-Marco
Ring the bells that still can ring.
Forget the perfect offering.
There is a crack in everything.
That's how the light gets in.
-Leonard Cohen
.
- References:
- which LISP implementation (goal explained)
- From: arnuld
- Re: which LISP implementation (goal explained)
- From: david.tolpin@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: which LISP implementation (goal explained)
- From: Marco Baringer
- Re: which LISP implementation (goal explained)
- From: david.tolpin@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: which LISP implementation (goal explained)
- From: Marco Baringer
- Re: which LISP implementation (goal explained)
- From: david.tolpin@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: which LISP implementation (goal explained)
- From: Marco Baringer
- Re: which LISP implementation (goal explained)
- From: arnuld
- which LISP implementation (goal explained)
- Prev by Date: Re: which LISP implementation (goal explained)
- Next by Date: Re: Allegro CL on OS X-Intel
- Previous by thread: Re: which LISP implementation (goal explained)
- Next by thread: Re: which LISP implementation (goal explained)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|