Re: which LISP implementation (goal explained)


I can't reproduce it on 0.9.11.8. I do get strange results though,
unless I change puri:shrink-vector to return the result of the call to
sb-kernel:shrink-vector. Perhaps the latter wasn't meant to be called
for side effects?

It is not called for side effects in encode-escaped-encoding. It's
return value is returned from the function and used by the caller.

David

.