Re: Relative merits of Lisp-1 vs. Lisp-2?

In article <1149023839.682144.169540@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
JesusWaffle@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

For Lisp-2:
* Can't accidentially shadow function names (especially important for
safe non-hygienic macros)

To be strictly correct: you can't shadow function names with
lambda-binding. You can still shadow them using flet (but as a result,
accidental shadowing is very rare).

rg
.