Re: Relative merits of Lisp-1 vs. Lisp-2?
- From: Didier Verna <didier@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 15:18:34 +0200
Pascal Costanza wrote:
What's wrong with that ?
((make-adder 10) 3) and (let ((x (make-adder 10))) (x 3)) would not be the
same.
I fail to see the point. Since you know you're in a Lisp-2, you know
(x 3) will need a functional value for x, which is not what let provides (you
have flet for that), so I'm not expecting those two expressions to be the same
at all. I just want to be able to write the first one and I don't see a good
reason why it's not possible.
--
Didier Verna, didier@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, http://www.lrde.epita.fr/~didier
EPITA / LRDE, 14-16 rue Voltaire Tel.+33 (1) 44 08 01 85
94276 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France Fax.+33 (1) 53 14 59 22 didier@xxxxxxxxxx
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Relative merits of Lisp-1 vs. Lisp-2?
- From: Pascal Costanza
- Re: Relative merits of Lisp-1 vs. Lisp-2?
- References:
- Relative merits of Lisp-1 vs. Lisp-2?
- From: JesusWaffle
- Re: Relative merits of Lisp-1 vs. Lisp-2?
- From: Pascal Costanza
- Re: Relative merits of Lisp-1 vs. Lisp-2?
- From: Didier Verna
- Re: Relative merits of Lisp-1 vs. Lisp-2?
- From: Pascal Costanza
- Relative merits of Lisp-1 vs. Lisp-2?
- Prev by Date: Green threads and Web-application
- Next by Date: Re: Compilation Error: ACL 7.0 Trial Edition
- Previous by thread: Re: Relative merits of Lisp-1 vs. Lisp-2?
- Next by thread: Re: Relative merits of Lisp-1 vs. Lisp-2?
- Index(es):