Re: Why is LISP syntax superior?
- From: keke@xxxxxxx (Takehiko Abe)
- Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 23:32:31 +0900
Whereas i see the point of advantages of something as
(+ (* 1 2) (/ 3 4))
over algebraic
1 * 2 + 3 / 4
-specially when managing dozens of operators- i am unable to see
realistic advantages over infix notation
((1 * 2) + (3 / 4))
what about
(+ (* 1 2 3) (/ 4 5 6))
vs
((1 * 2 * 3) + (4 / 5 / 6))
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why is LISP syntax superior?
- From: Juan R.
- Re: Why is LISP syntax superior?
- References:
- Why is LISP syntax superior?
- From: Juan R.
- Why is LISP syntax superior?
- Prev by Date: Why is LISP syntax superior?
- Next by Date: Re: Why is LISP syntax superior?
- Previous by thread: Why is LISP syntax superior?
- Next by thread: Re: Why is LISP syntax superior?
- Index(es):