Re: What would a modern LispOS look like?
- From: Stefan Mandl <stefan.mandl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 00:45:17 +0200
I don't think so... Why care about C if you have a machine dedicated to
Lisp?
Let me quote from here: http://www.erlang.org/ml-archive/erlang-questions/200302/msg00646.html
The problem was that one machine started at $40K
and they ran up to $150K or so, but they weren't
servers. They were workstations for individual programmers.
Sun was still on the Sun 2 or 3, but they were getting
faster and people were saying Lisp could run almost
fast enough on them. Meanwhile Symbolics delivered
a full C interpreter(!) where you could modify code in
the debugger and resume with new variables defined
or even new functions. C on a LISP machine is a hard
sell.
ok, an interpreter ;)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- KnowOS (Was: What would a modern LispOS look like?)
- From: JShrager
- KnowOS (Was: What would a modern LispOS look like?)
- References:
- What would a modern LispOS look like?
- From: bradb
- Re: What would a modern LispOS look like?
- From: Anon
- Re: What would a modern LispOS look like?
- From: Stefan Mandl
- Re: What would a modern LispOS look like?
- From: Sascha Matzke
- What would a modern LispOS look like?
- Prev by Date: KnowOS (was What would a modern LispOS look like?)
- Next by Date: KnowOS (Was: What would a modern LispOS look like?)
- Previous by thread: KnowOS (was What would a modern LispOS look like?)
- Next by thread: KnowOS (Was: What would a modern LispOS look like?)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|