Re: What would a modern LispOS look like?
- From: Pascal Bourguignon <pjb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 23:15:19 +0200
"goose" <ruse@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
[1] unless that language is C. Writing your spiffy tic-tac-toe-solving
library in plain std C means that it can be used on any platform that
has a conforming C compiler i.e. 99% of platforms. Those platforms that
don't have a C compiler most certainly won't have any other HLL
compiler
either and will be typically programmed in assembler or similar.
Writing that same logic into a library in most other languages limits
you to the platforms that have a compiler and/or environment for that
language.
But given that most other programming languages have at least one
implementation written in C, they're actually available on 98.999% of
the platforms too!
--
__Pascal Bourguignon__ http://www.informatimago.com/
PLEASE NOTE: Some quantum physics theories suggest that when the
consumer is not directly observing this product, it may cease to
exist or will exist only in a vague and undetermined state.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: What would a modern LispOS look like?
- From: goose
- Re: What would a modern LispOS look like?
- References:
- What would a modern LispOS look like?
- From: bradb
- Re: What would a modern LispOS look like?
- From: goose
- What would a modern LispOS look like?
- Prev by Date: Re: Why is LISP syntax superior?
- Next by Date: Re: LISP code example matching an abstract construct
- Previous by thread: Re: What would a modern LispOS look like?
- Next by thread: Re: What would a modern LispOS look like?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|