Re: Very confused about packages.
- From: rsobriquet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 29 Jun 2006 22:08:53 -0700
Pillsbury,
Shapiro's book is fantastic.
defpackage "match"
(:shadow boundp substitute))
(in-package "match")
That should be (defpackage "MATCH" ...) and (in-package "MATCH"). I
believe that Chapter 6 and Chapter 7 spend some time discussing the
many different printed representations that symbols possess. (Everyone
runs into this problem).
Good Luck,
Rand
(please don't email me because it doesn't work)
==================== aside ============================
If you're using LispWorks with this example, you'll get a package name
clash.
Here is the relevant lisp-hug thread:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.lispworks.general/3543/focus=3546
==================== aside ============================
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Very confused about packages.
- From: Timofei Shatrov
- Re: Very confused about packages.
- From: pillsbury
- Re: Very confused about packages.
- References:
- Very confused about packages.
- From: pillsbury
- Very confused about packages.
- Prev by Date: Re: A logo proposal
- Next by Date: Re: A logo proposal
- Previous by thread: Very confused about packages.
- Next by thread: Re: Very confused about packages.
- Index(es):