Re: Amazon used lisp & C exclusively?
- From: Frank Buss <fb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 15:58:08 +0200
Alok wrote:
http://www.cabochon.com/~stevey/blog-rants/tour-de-babel.html
Quoting the article, they are using more languages:
| C, C++, Lisp, Java, Perl, (all languages we use at Amazon),
And looks like they don't use Lisp very much today, because they have a
large C++ code base:
| We have 50 million lines of C++ code.
| and was expanding at 8 million lines a quarter
and:
| I think there may still be more Lisp hackers, per capita, in CS Apps
| than in any other group at Amazon. Not that they get to use it much
And they rewrote an Emacs Lisp solution in JSP (Java):
| they missed Mailman and Emacs, and how Arizona
| (the JSP replacement we'd spent years developing)
| still just wasn't doing it for them.
--
Frank Buss, fb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.frank-buss.de, http://www.it4-systems.de
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Amazon used lisp & C exclusively?
- From: Ken Tilton
- Re: Amazon used lisp & C exclusively?
- References:
- Amazon used lisp & C exclusively?
- From: Alok
- Amazon used lisp & C exclusively?
- Prev by Date: Re: should languages be typed?
- Next by Date: Re: efficiently accumulating values
- Previous by thread: Re: Amazon used lisp & C exclusively?
- Next by thread: Re: Amazon used lisp & C exclusively?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|