Re: Minimal keywords needed for constructing a full CL system
- From: bojohan+news@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Johan Bockgård)
- Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 05:36:47 +0200
rpw3@xxxxxxxx (Rob Warnock) writes:
And if Emacs Lisp is your implementation substrate, then the expression
(/ 3 5) ==> 0.6 would fail to have equivalent semantics in full CL.
Actually, (/ 3 5) ==> 0
--
Johan Bockgård
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Minimal keywords needed for constructing a full CL system
- From: Sidney Markowitz
- Re: Minimal keywords needed for constructing a full CL system
- References:
- Minimal keywords needed for constructing a full CL system
- From: Javier
- Re: Minimal keywords needed for constructing a full CL system
- From: Rob Thorpe
- Re: Minimal keywords needed for constructing a full CL system
- From: Rob Warnock
- Re: Minimal keywords needed for constructing a full CL system
- From: Lars Brinkhoff
- Re: Minimal keywords needed for constructing a full CL system
- From: Rob Warnock
- Minimal keywords needed for constructing a full CL system
- Prev by Date: Re: Minimal keywords needed for constructing a full CL system
- Next by Date: Re: Minimal keywords needed for constructing a full CL system
- Previous by thread: Re: Minimal keywords needed for constructing a full CL system
- Next by thread: Re: Minimal keywords needed for constructing a full CL system
- Index(es):
