Re: GNU CLISP 2.39 (2006-07-16)
- From: "bradb" <brad.beveridge@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 17 Jul 2006 11:44:29 -0700
Javier wrote:
bradb wrote:Does that mean there is no alternative GC? I noticed the warnings upon
Javier wrote:
Thank you.
When is CLISP going to support Intel Mac OSX?
I happened to compile CLISP from CVS yesteday on Intel OSX without any
problems. I couldn't get libsigsev to work right away, so I forced
CLISP to ignore it.
CLISP appeared to install and work correctly, I could run the Slime
backend and evaluate forms.
Sure, but without libsigsev there is not generation GC (that is said in
the INSTALL file).
install about no generational GC, but I would expect if there was no GC
at all I would get big screaming letters telling me that CLISP was
cripped by lack of a GC.
libsigsegv appears to have worked on Darwin i686 as recently as 2.4, I
can't imagine that there are huge changes/bugs preventing libsegsegv
from working on OSX Intel.
Cheers
Brad
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: GNU CLISP 2.39 (2006-07-16)
- From: Pascal Costanza
- Re: GNU CLISP 2.39 (2006-07-16)
- References:
- GNU CLISP 2.39 (2006-07-16)
- From: Sam Steingold
- Re: GNU CLISP 2.39 (2006-07-16)
- From: Javier
- Re: GNU CLISP 2.39 (2006-07-16)
- From: bradb
- Re: GNU CLISP 2.39 (2006-07-16)
- From: Javier
- GNU CLISP 2.39 (2006-07-16)
- Prev by Date: Re: GNU CLISP 2.39 (2006-07-16)
- Next by Date: Re: Minimal keywords needed for constructing a full CL system
- Previous by thread: Re: GNU CLISP 2.39 (2006-07-16)
- Next by thread: Re: GNU CLISP 2.39 (2006-07-16)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
