Re: Question re CL need of funcall ?
- From: Barry Margolin <barmar@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 20:51:55 -0400
In article <1153161692.659831.246440@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"fireblade" <BLASESKI@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
couldn't compiler insert funcall when it sees fn after opening bracket
so this would be the same as above :
Consider:
(defun baz (list x)
(list list x))
If it automatically inserted funcall, this would call the wrong function.
MACLisp had an option to do the automatic funcall if the name at the
beginning of an expression doesn't have a function binding, but AFAIK no
one ever turned on the option.
--
Barry Margolin, barmar@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Arlington, MA
*** PLEASE post questions in newsgroups, not directly to me ***
*** PLEASE don't copy me on replies, I'll read them in the group ***
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Amazon used lisp & C exclusively?
- Next by Date: Re: Amazon used lisp & C exclusively?
- Previous by thread: Re: Question re CL need of funcall ?
- Next by thread: Initial Thoughts on Montezuma
- Index(es):