Re: No array update w/o setf?
- From: Ken Tilton <kentilton@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 10:40:00 -0400
Yet another Dan wrote:
Pascal Bourguignon wrote:
What's wrong with aref?
I'm starting index values from 1 instead of 0.
Because your array goes to eleven? I think this is The Real Problem. Why on earth do you want an array starting at one? I ask because I think The Great Contribution to society of computer science is the news that zero should have been the first natural number.
kt
--
Cells: http://common-lisp.net/project/cells/
"I'll say I'm losing my grip, and it feels terrific."
-- Smiling husband to scowling wife, New Yorker cartoon
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: No array update w/o setf?
- From: Rob Warnock
- Re: No array update w/o setf?
- From: Yet another Dan
- Re: No array update w/o setf?
- From: Timofei Shatrov
- Re: No array update w/o setf?
- From: Darren New
- Re: No array update w/o setf?
- References:
- No array update w/o setf?
- From: Yet another Dan
- Re: No array update w/o setf?
- From: Pascal Bourguignon
- Re: No array update w/o setf?
- From: Yet another Dan
- No array update w/o setf?
- Prev by Date: Re: Economics
- Next by Date: Re: How to read a binary floating-point file?
- Previous by thread: Re: No array update w/o setf?
- Next by thread: Re: No array update w/o setf?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|