Re: Theories on why Lisp source *seems* to have less comments?
- From: David Steuber <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 28 Jul 2006 23:57:49 -0400
Oddly enough, I found Perl to be a decent stepping stone to Lisp.
--
The lithobraker. Zero distance stops at any speed.
This post uses 100% post consumer electrons and 100% virgin photons.
At 2.6 miles per minute, you don't really have time to get bored.
--- Pete Roehling on rec.motorcycles
.
- References:
- Theories on why Lisp source *seems* to have less comments?
- From: Jonathon McKitrick
- Re: Theories on why Lisp source *seems* to have less comments?
- From: Tim X
- Re: Theories on why Lisp source *seems* to have less comments?
- From: Rob Warnock
- Re: Theories on why Lisp source *seems* to have less comments?
- From: Tim X
- Re: Theories on why Lisp source *seems* to have less comments?
- From: Rob Warnock
- Theories on why Lisp source *seems* to have less comments?
- Prev by Date: Re: Theories on why Lisp source *seems* to have less comments?
- Next by Date: Re: the free software paradigm [was Re: Amazon used lisp & C exclusively?
- Previous by thread: Re: Theories on why Lisp source *seems* to have less comments?
- Next by thread: Re: Theories on why Lisp source *seems* to have less comments?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|