Re: the free software paradigm [was Re: Amazon used lisp & C exclusively?



On 2006-07-26 01:36:17 -0400, Rajappa Iyer <rsi@xxxxxxxxx> said:

The important fact that is being ignored is that well over 90% of the
software industry consists of turnkey and custom software solutions,
an area where free software can never make inroads.

But it most certainly can and does when free software forms an important part of these custom solutions because that means these custom solutions will require fewer paid programming hours. Notice I said *paid* programming hours - the total number of hours will be the same, its just that no programmers will be getting paid for the work they did to produce the free software components of the custom solution.

Again, as long as the only free components are infrastructure software the arguemnt can be made that this is a wash for programmers. But if the custom solution contains free components that are not infrastructure software then this will be a net loss for programmers.

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: the free software paradigm [was Re: Amazon used lisp & C exclusively?
    ... a hypothetical custom solution consists of a Point Of Sale ... If it is proprietary the POS software will be maintained and improved ... by programmers who are paid for their labor. ... If you've got some free software that you want ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)
  • Re: the free software paradigm [was Re: Amazon used lisp & C exclusively?
    ... software industry consists of turnkey and custom software solutions, ... an area where free software can never make inroads. ... custom solutions will require fewer paid programming hours. ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)
  • Re: the free software paradigm [was Re: Amazon used lisp & C exclusively?
    ... Suppose your answer is "you can't get money" or "don't expect enough ... a free software sniper instantly de-value innovation and claim its ... And if you don't like my inspiration, ... Free software can't preempt you there, because its programmers don't have access to the hardware before you do. ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)
  • Re: the free software paradigm [was Re: Amazon used lisp & C exclusively?
    ... As long as the free software in question is tools that programmers use to do their job then contributing to such projects can be seen, on balance, to be a net win for programmers - the potential lost revenue from selling software tools is balanced by the widespread availability of low or zero cost development tools. ... Without proprietary software, Windows and Office could be sold for 50 cents a copy, so there go all the high paying jobs of Microsoft employees and all their contractors and suppliers. ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)
  • Re: the free software paradigm [was Re: Amazon used lisp & C exclusively?
    ... written by people who are being *paid* to write it. ... are alloting part of their own wages to fund their own free software ... These two are fundamentally different as far as programmers are ... shareware, as most users don't pay commercial software either), should ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)