Re: Where comes the myth that Lisp is interpreted?!
- From: Zach Beane <xach@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: 21 Aug 2006 13:17:57 -0400
Markus Grueneis <grueneis.m@xxxxxxx> writes:
After pointing out during a lecture that Mathematica was very much
like Lisp, I asked if it may be programmed in any Lisp dialect.
Short answer: "Oh, I don't know, but for sure it's not Lisp, for
performance reasons that would not be possible."
I am reminded of this message:
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.lisp/msg/f3b93140c2f2e922
It looks like the Mathematica bias against Lisp goes back to the
beginning.
Zach
.
- References:
- Where comes the myth that Lisp is interpreted?!
- From: Pierre THIERRY
- Re: Where comes the myth that Lisp is interpreted?!
- From: Rob Thorpe
- Re: Where comes the myth that Lisp is interpreted?!
- From: George Neuner
- Re: Where comes the myth that Lisp is interpreted?!
- From: JShrager
- Re: Where comes the myth that Lisp is interpreted?!
- From: Duane Rettig
- Re: Where comes the myth that Lisp is interpreted?!
- From: Markus Grueneis
- Where comes the myth that Lisp is interpreted?!
- Prev by Date: Re: Where comes the myth that Lisp is interpreted?!
- Next by Date: Re: Where comes the myth that Lisp is interpreted?!
- Previous by thread: Re: Where comes the myth that Lisp is interpreted?!
- Next by thread: Re: Where comes the myth that Lisp is interpreted?!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|