Re: Any Chinese Lispers here?
- From: Pascal Bourguignon <pjb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 20:42:38 +0200
Lei Tang <L.Tang@xxxxxxx> writes:
Pascal Bourguignon wrote:
"Pebblestone" <hadeshuang@xxxxxxxxx> writes:Oh, this is way too cool. I didn't expect CLISP can handle Chinese
Le'ts keep contact! Lisp is an awesome language!Hello! Even if we're not chinese, we can keep contact all the same.
send me email!
hadeshuang@xxxxxxxxx
Just don't use too many chinese symbols in your sources :-)
[126]> (defun 因子 (x) (if (< x 1) 1 (* x (因子 (1- x)))))
因子
[127]> (因子 12)
479001600
[128]> (lisp-implementation-type)
"CLISP"
directly. But the problem is emacs/xemacs and slime might not be good
at handling Chinese.
Works from slime too:
; SLIME 2006-02-10
CL-USER> (defun 阶乘 (x) (if (< x 1) 1 (* x (阶乘- x))))
阶乘
CL-USER> (阶乘 12)
; Evaluation aborted
CL-USER> (defun 阶乘 (x) (if (< x 1) 1 (* x (阶乘 (1- x)))))
阶乘
CL-USER> (阶乘 12)
479001600
CL-USER>
And also from a lisp buffer, if I type:
(defun 阶乘 (x) (if (< x 1) 1 (* x (阶乘 (1- x))))) C-x C-e
(阶乘 13) C-x C-e
I get the result:
6227020800
and in *slime-repl*:
;;;; (defun 阶乘 (x) (if (< x 1) 1 (* x (阶乘 (1- x))))) ...
;;;; (阶乘 13) ...
CL-USER>
If I right-click on the function name and select inspect, I get a buffer with:
A symbol.
[type: SYMBOL]
--------------------
Its name is: "阶乘"
It is unbound.
It is a function: #<FUNCTION 阶乘 (X) (DECLARE (SYSTEM::IN-DEFUN 阶乘)) (BLOCK 阶乘 (IF (< X 1) 1 (* X (阶乘 (1- X)))))> [make funbound]
It is internal to the package: COMMON-LISP-USER [export it] [unintern it]
Property list: (SYSTEM::DEFINITION ((DEFUN 阶乘 (X) (IF (< X 1) 1 (* X (阶乘 (1- X))))) . #(NIL NIL NIL NIL ((DECLARATION XLIB::CLX-VALUES VALUES OPTIMIZE DECLARATION)))))
etc...
I'd be hard pressed to cite the minimal configuration settings needed
to make it work (I don't use slime often enough to know it that well),
but you can download my ~/.emacs from cvs at:
cvs -z3 -d :pserver:anonymous@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:/usr/local/cvs/public/chrooted-cvs/cvs co home
and what I've cited in another message in this thread may be all there
is to it. You can also check M-x apropos RET slime.*coding RET or
read the manual of slime.
--
__Pascal Bourguignon__
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Any Chinese Lispers here?
- From: Fabien LE LEZ
- Re: Any Chinese Lispers here?
- References:
- Any Chinese Lispers here?
- From: Pebblestone
- Re: Any Chinese Lispers here?
- From: Pascal Bourguignon
- Re: Any Chinese Lispers here?
- From: Lei Tang
- Any Chinese Lispers here?
- Prev by Date: Re: ANN: Graphic-Forms version 0.5.0 released
- Next by Date: CL implementations and tail-call optimization
- Previous by thread: Re: Any Chinese Lispers here?
- Next by thread: Re: Any Chinese Lispers here?
- Index(es):