Re: LISP V APL?

Dare I mention that this particular google feature is rather unreliable.

That's the least of the issues, which is why (a) I did multiple
phrases, and (b) I said that my analysis was (to put it as positively
as possible) heuristic and statistical -- meaning: Probably mostly
wrong! :-)

[Although it's interesting and scary too see how much code it takes to
approximate a whole google tool (google trends -- although I'd have to
wrap another loop around it to go across time). Google's sort of like
fifty ten-line lisp programs (or one line APL programs! :-), mapped
over a giant centralized database, each with a fancy name and icon, a
bad ajax interface, and piled hugh with advertising. Amazing what you
can make a zillion dollars for these days.]

.