Re: Lisp Garbage Collection
- From: Pascal Bourguignon <pjb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 06:08:53 +0200
"skibud2" <mike.halloran@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
I was talking with a fellow engineer at work about why CMUCL and SBCL
have not been fully ported to Windows. He mentioned that it is
difficult to port most Lisp implementations because of difference
between the Linux and Windows memory models and how they are used for
garbage collection. Can someone shed some light on what these
differences are.
http://www.google.com/search?q=comparison+%22memory+management%22+unix+windows
--
__Pascal Bourguignon__
.
- References:
- Lisp Garbage Collection
- From: skibud2
- Lisp Garbage Collection
- Prev by Date: Re: Lisp v C?
- Next by Date: gensym in macro definition
- Previous by thread: Lisp Garbage Collection
- Next by thread: Re: Lisp Garbage Collection
- Index(es):