Re: Lisp Garbage Collection
- From: "Robert Dodier" <robert.dodier@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 Aug 2006 23:44:09 -0700
Christophe Rhodes wrote:
I also dispute your premise; both SBCL and CMUCL have been "fully"
ported to windows, and though it is likely that bugs remain in the
port you can test this for yourself in the case of SBCL.
The SBCL ports page (http://sbcl.sourceforge.net/platform-table.html)
claims the Windows port is "in progress". Is that page out of date?
I have it on good authority that the SBCL Windows port (0.9.12),
as it stands, prints a disclaimer on start up which says
"This is an experimental prerelease support of the Windows platform:
use at your own risk. Your Kitten of Death awaits!"
Did they fix the bugs and forget to remove the disclaimer?
Just curious. I'd like to see a Windows port as much as anybody.
Robert Dodier
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Lisp Garbage Collection
- From: Christophe Rhodes
- Re: Lisp Garbage Collection
- References:
- Lisp Garbage Collection
- From: skibud2
- Re: Lisp Garbage Collection
- From: Christophe Rhodes
- Lisp Garbage Collection
- Prev by Date: Re: sbcl and non-ascii filenames (again)
- Next by Date: Re: Java is going to have closures.
- Previous by thread: Re: Lisp Garbage Collection
- Next by thread: Re: Lisp Garbage Collection
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|