Re: Java is going to have closures.
- From: "Tim Bradshaw" <tfb+google@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: 31 Aug 2006 06:30:26 -0700
MarkHaniford@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
It doesn't use 500MB just to run the IDE (not even close), so obviously
he was talking out of his ass about things he has no idea about.
I used to do some Java stuff on a box with 384MB (running windows 2000
and nothing else significant, probably a VNC viewer and a couple of
cygwin shells) and it was very painful indeed.
half a gig is probably a reasonable minimum if you don't want to sit
around a lot. I can't see any reason at all to have less than a gig
myself, & I'd not configure a development machine with less than 2 (by
the time you've god a VMware image for test etc, you need lots). Now
you're going to say `but that's for the IDE *and* the OS etc, not just
the IDE', but that is, in fact, the question that was asked and
originally answered.
--tim
.
- References:
- Java is going to have closures.
- From: Javier
- Re: Java is going to have closures.
- From: David Steuber
- Re: Java is going to have closures.
- From: joh
- Re: Java is going to have closures.
- From: Novus
- Re: Java is going to have closures.
- From: MarkHaniford@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Java is going to have closures.
- From: Fabien LE LEZ
- Re: Java is going to have closures.
- From: John Thingstad
- Re: Java is going to have closures.
- From: MarkHaniford@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Java is going to have closures.
- From: Joe Knapka
- Re: Java is going to have closures.
- From: MarkHaniford@xxxxxxxxx
- Java is going to have closures.
- Prev by Date: Juggling with binary files?
- Next by Date: Re: perceived efficiency
- Previous by thread: Re: Java is going to have closures.
- Next by thread: Re: Java is going to have closures.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
