Re: Lisp Garbage Collection
- From: David Lichteblau <dave-cll@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 31 Aug 2006 17:03:57 GMT
On 2006-08-31, llothar <llothar@xxxxxx> wrote:
When i have the todo list right in mind the largest problem is that
under Win32 you can't allocate a fixed address range and so loaded
compiled code must be able relocateable. The current implementation of
the SBCL compiler is not.
It is true that Alastair Bridgewater listed that as a potential problem.
Although I do not know the technical reasons for his comment, let me
note that so far nobody has turned up who actually had problems with
SBCL on Windows because of this, so it does not seem to be a big problem
at this point.
Also note that there is a patch for relocation that mostly works, both
on Windows and Unix (well, Linux and BSD).
d.
.
- References:
- Lisp Garbage Collection
- From: skibud2
- Re: Lisp Garbage Collection
- From: llothar
- Lisp Garbage Collection
- Prev by Date: Re: Lets talk about GUI and sound libraries
- Next by Date: Re: Lets talk about GUI and sound libraries
- Previous by thread: Re: Lisp Garbage Collection
- Next by thread: gensym in macro definition
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
