Re: Java is going to have closures.
- From: Fabien LE LEZ <gramster@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2006 18:31:28 +0200
On Fri, 1 Sep 2006 02:07:32 +0100, Tim Bradshaw <tfb@xxxxxxxx>:
AFAIK, the slowest part in a hard drive, i.e. the mechanical part, is
the same for a PATA drive and a SATA drive.
Well, that's my point: probably they're not, because new drives may
well not be shipping with PATA.
I believe the controller card is pretty independant.
And it's pretty soon to put PATA drives into their grave -- lots of
PATA disks are still being sold.
But anyway, my point is, there isn't much evolution in hard drives'
mechanical parts: the platters still turn at 7200 rpm, like five years
ago.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Java is going to have closures.
- From: Tim Bradshaw
- Re: Java is going to have closures.
- From: John Thingstad
- Re: Java is going to have closures.
- References:
- Re: Java is going to have closures.
- From: Fabien LE LEZ
- Re: Java is going to have closures.
- From: Tim Bradshaw
- Re: Java is going to have closures.
- Prev by Date: Re: Converting between different unsigned-byte results
- Next by Date: Joel hammers the final nail into Lisp's coffin
- Previous by thread: Re: Java is going to have closures.
- Next by thread: Re: Java is going to have closures.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
