Re: OT: (free) incident managment system opinions?
- From: Fred Gilham <gilham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2006 12:31:12 -0700
David Golden <david.golden@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
jmckitrick wrote:
David Golden wrote:
Anyway, what sort of incidents? If you mean computer security
incidents, there's Request Tracker for Incident Response:
http://www.bestpractical.com/rtir/
It's open source but you can pay for support and customisation.
The official term is 'incident' but what it really means is bugs
and/or feature requests.
Some sort of corpie-speak? Sigh. Weird, though. Usually people try to
downplay bugs, calling them "issues" or "variances". To me, "incident"
has far worse connotations than "bug"... bugs might lead to
incidents... Maybe that's deliberate, people were going "oh, it's only
a bug". But now it's "incident". Oh no...
Someone once argued that calling something a "bug" downplays it, and
that people should call such things "errors".
I guess the original so-called "bug" was an actual bug and not an
error. Or perhaps it was an error in the hardware design, not making
it proof against flying insects. But that was probably the result of
an error in the spec.
So in this case an error in the spec led to a bug in the hardware
which led to an incident. :-)
--
Fred Gilham gilham@xxxxxxxxxxx
Thou shalt not convince stupid people to try cordless bungee jumping....
Thou shalt not substitute Semtex when all the Playdough's gone....
Thou shalt not bob for hand grenades....
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT: (free) incident managment system opinions?
- From: Rob Warnock
- Re: OT: (free) incident managment system opinions?
- From: Paolo Amoroso
- Re: OT: (free) incident managment system opinions?
- Prev by Date: Re: is there a clisp or scheme application server?
- Next by Date: Re: Java is going to have closures.
- Previous by thread: is there a clisp or scheme application server?
- Next by thread: Re: OT: (free) incident managment system opinions?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|