Re: About GUI and lisps...
- From: "MarkHaniford@xxxxxxxxx" <MarkHaniford@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 9 Sep 2006 16:33:11 -0700
goose wrote:
MarkHaniford@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
goose wrote:
Really, MS is a corporate, you must assume that they
will do what is best for *them*, not for *you*.
goose,
Yeah, because any "they" who is coding, is going to code for "their"
interests and not "yours". That's true in any project. By the way,
RMS is not a corporate and I'll have to assume that he's doing what's
best for himself, and not what is best for me.
Gnome has already made their decision, and any belly-aching on your
part is irrelevant.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: About GUI and lisps...
- From: Rob Thorpe
- Re: About GUI and lisps...
- From: goose
- Re: About GUI and lisps...
- References:
- About GUI and lisps...
- From: Juanjo
- Re: About GUI and lisps...
- From: Rob Thorpe
- Re: About GUI and lisps...
- From: goose
- Re: About GUI and lisps...
- From: MarkHaniford@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: About GUI and lisps...
- From: goose
- About GUI and lisps...
- Prev by Date: Re: A more elegant solution to this problem?
- Next by Date: Re: MJD (of "Higher Order Perl") on Lisp macros / defsetf -> define-setf-expander
- Previous by thread: Re: About GUI and lisps...
- Next by thread: Re: About GUI and lisps...
- Index(es):