Lightspeed Lisp
- From: GP lisper <spambait@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 04:31:24 -0700
"...And if someone throws me a bug, I can code around it in a few
minutes." --Richard Gabriel
Hey all you lisp bashers that wander in here, BEAT THIS!
Late last year:
--------------------------------
Look at this one:
(clsql:sql
(clsql-sys::make-query [foo] [bar] [count [foo]]
:from [table]
:group-by '([foo] [bar])
:order-by '([foo] [bar])))
=> "SELECT FOO,BAR,COUNT(FOO) FROM TABLE GROUP BY (FOO,BAR) ORDER BY FOO,BAR"
I believe the parentheses around FOO,BAR in the GROUP BY clause are
wrong.
--------------------------------
Indeed they are, a fix is outlined...a challege issued by maintainer
to show fix is not postgress-centric, response prompts:
*********************************
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 11:36:52 -0600
Harald Hanche-Olsen wrote:
If you mean am I in possession of a copy of ISO/IEC 9075:2003, no I
don't. But I do find grammars the SELECT statement in various places,
for example
Thanks for the supplemental information, Harald. That's good enough for
me. I'll look at producing a fix.
*********************************
Note the timestamp, and
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 11:44:31 -0600
Kevin Rosenberg wrote:
Thanks for the supplemental information, Harald. That's good enough for
me. I'll look at producing a fix.
Version 3.3.2 has this fixed and a test added to the test suite for
this.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
8 minutes, including test!
ALL YOUR BASES BELONG TO LISP!
....not to mention that the fix could have been dropped into RUNNING
code without a hitch, restart, nor recompile/relink...
--
Reply-To email is ignored.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
- Prev by Date: Re: [CLOS] Ensuring a method exists
- Next by Date: Re: Pocket Lisp Machine
- Previous by thread: Deploying application with SBCL, ASDF
- Next by thread: What's wrong with Common Lisp's lambda ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
