Re: What's wrong with Common Lisp's lambda ?
- From: Barry Margolin <barmar@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 11:53:14 -0400
In article <o0ven89fqi.fsf@xxxxxxxxx>, Duane Rettig <duane@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Looks like a CPS issue to me, not a lambda issue (at least directly).
Since CL doesn't have continuations, I'm not sure there's really much of
a distinction. Lambda is the only way to make a closure, and the point
is that closures can't be used to re-enter a control context that has
been exited.
--
Barry Margolin, barmar@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Arlington, MA
*** PLEASE post questions in newsgroups, not directly to me ***
*** PLEASE don't copy me on replies, I'll read them in the group ***
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: What's wrong with Common Lisp's lambda ?
- From: Duane Rettig
- Re: What's wrong with Common Lisp's lambda ?
- References:
- What's wrong with Common Lisp's lambda ?
- From: Karol Skocik
- Re: What's wrong with Common Lisp's lambda ?
- From: Barry Margolin
- Re: What's wrong with Common Lisp's lambda ?
- From: Duane Rettig
- What's wrong with Common Lisp's lambda ?
- Prev by Date: Re: Aha! moments
- Next by Date: Re: What's wrong with Common Lisp's lambda ?
- Previous by thread: Re: What's wrong with Common Lisp's lambda ?
- Next by thread: Re: What's wrong with Common Lisp's lambda ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|