Re: performance and eloquence
- From: "Joe Marshall" <eval.apply@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 3 Oct 2006 09:14:08 -0700
Unknownmat wrote:
You know, I read the rantings of the cranks in sci.physics (who don't
like Einstein, for some reason), and in sci.math (who don't like Cantor
for some reason), but I never thought Lisp would acquire its very own
crank.
A crank? In comp.lang.lisp?!! Perish the thought!
.
- References:
- performance and eloquence
- From: Andrew Wolven
- Re: performance and eloquence
- From: David Golden
- Re: performance and eloquence
- From: awolven
- Re: performance and eloquence
- From: Ivan Boldyrev
- Re: performance and eloquence
- From: Unknownmat
- performance and eloquence
- Prev by Date: Re: The proof:Why Lisp doesn't generate successful biz
- Next by Date: Re: GNU CLISP 2.40 (2006-09-23)
- Previous by thread: Re: performance and eloquence
- Next by thread: Re: performance and eloquence
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|