Re: performance and eloquence
- From: "Unknownmat" <unknownmat@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 2 Oct 2006 18:01:21 -0700
Ivan Boldyrev wrote:
On 9614 day of my life awolven@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
David Golden wrote:
Andrew Wolven wrote:Either I'm not Real or you are an idiot.
Real Mechanical Engineers use Fortran and like it.
You are clearly not Real. You are either Rational or Integer.
Hah, I think that's the only post that gives this nut-job the credit
that he deserves.
You know, I read the rantings of the cranks in sci.physics (who don't
like Einstein, for some reason), and in sci.math (who don't like Cantor
for some reason), but I never thought Lisp would acquire its very own
crank.
I'm waiting with bated breath for him to tell us which monumental
figures of computer science was mistaken (McCarthy perhaps?).
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: performance and eloquence
- From: Joe Marshall
- Re: performance and eloquence
- References:
- performance and eloquence
- From: Andrew Wolven
- Re: performance and eloquence
- From: David Golden
- Re: performance and eloquence
- From: awolven
- Re: performance and eloquence
- From: Ivan Boldyrev
- performance and eloquence
- Prev by Date: Re: to (or not to) lambda
- Next by Date: Re: a potential lisp convert, and interpreting the shootout
- Previous by thread: Re: performance and eloquence
- Next by thread: Re: performance and eloquence
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|