Re: performance and eloquence
- From: awolven@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 30 Sep 2006 17:19:31 -0700
David Golden wrote:
Andrew Wolven wrote:Either I'm not Real or you are an idiot.
I am a mechanical engineering major. Why do I feel like I need to useI dunno. Real Mechanical Engineers use Fortran and like it.
MATLAB?
(Actually, it's not as bad as it sounds. Fortran 90->95->2003 has become
miles away from many non-fortranners idea of fortran, just as common
lisp is miles away from many non-lispers ancient mental picture
of lisp).
So are you going to rewrite for me DOE-2 in FORTRAN 2003 so that the
engineers can read the knowledge base? Has to be as easy as Excel to
program for them. Heck, why not integrated with Excel? A KBE program
like GDL or Icad can be connected to excel, but you still have to write
the DOE stuff. MATLAB, I have seen in docs say they do OLE servers.
But why do I have to connect all of this external stuff? It's just
more work. Oh wait!!! I really like FORTRAN!!! Why didn't I think of
that first.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: performance and eloquence
- From: Ivan Boldyrev
- Re: performance and eloquence
- From: David Golden
- Re: performance and eloquence
- References:
- performance and eloquence
- From: Andrew Wolven
- Re: performance and eloquence
- From: David Golden
- performance and eloquence
- Prev by Date: Re: performance and eloquence
- Next by Date: Re: a potential lisp convert, and interpreting the shootout
- Previous by thread: Re: performance and eloquence
- Next by thread: Re: performance and eloquence
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|