Re: allegro cl installer -- A.I built in, all the way DOWN
- From: Bill Atkins <atkinw@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 11:27:21 -0500
"Alex Mizrahi" <udodenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
does LispWorks offer a webserver implementation,
Not out of the box, but Hutchentoot, Araneda, mod_lisp, and
portable_aserve are all easily obtained.
internal DB like AllegroCache, triple store like AllegroGraph,
Nope.
native threads support?
Of course.
do they have some RDF reasoner for it, like RACER for ACL?
Nope. Are you intending to use AllegroCache, AllegroGraph, and RACER,
or are you just comparing features?
and as for performace, i don't think lispworks will win here.
Why?
so i don't see LispWorks bringing any additional value over free
implementations, unlike AllegroCL.
How about a vastly superior IDE, a sane licensing policy, and the CAPI
toolkit?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: allegro cl installer -- A.I built in, all the way DOWN
- From: Alex Mizrahi
- Re: allegro cl installer -- A.I built in, all the way DOWN
- References:
- allegro cl installer -- A.I built in, all the way DOWN
- From: Alex Mizrahi
- Re: allegro cl installer -- A.I built in, all the way DOWN
- From: Bill Atkins
- Re: allegro cl installer -- A.I built in, all the way DOWN
- From: Alex Mizrahi
- allegro cl installer -- A.I built in, all the way DOWN
- Prev by Date: Re: c macros -- turing complete?
- Next by Date: Re: c macros -- turing complete?
- Previous by thread: Re: allegro cl installer -- A.I built in, all the way DOWN
- Next by thread: Re: allegro cl installer -- A.I built in, all the way DOWN
- Index(es):