Re: (asdf:oos 'asdf:unload-op 'cl-spont)

JohnFredCee wrote:
Suppose I make such a mess of loading and compiling my asdf package
(It's unsder
active development) that I wish to scracth the whole thing and start
again. Drastic,
I know - but sometimes it happens. (delete-package 'cl-spont) followed
by
(asdf:oos 'asdf:load-op 'cl-spont) doesn't seem to work...is it
actually possible, or does
the whole REPL have to be junked and restarted..?

Slightly offtopic - but why are ASDF calls of the form
(asdf:oos something package) ?

Surely something like
(asdf:load-op 'package) is nicer looking?

Cheers
Brad

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: (asdf:oos asdf:unload-op cl-spont)
    ... (It's unsder active development) ... that I wish to scracth the whole ... (delete-package 'cl-spont) ... 'asdf:load-op 'cl-spont) doesn't seem to work... ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)
  • Re: asdf unload-op ??
    ... symbols from this package, and to forget this package name and nicknames. ... LISP> ... LISP> (delete-package:exemple) ... first time, and as #:FUN the second time. ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)
  • Re: asdf unload-op ??
    ... symbols from this package, and to forget this package name and nicknames. ... LISP> ... LISP> (delete-package:exemple) ... first time, and as #:FUN the second time. ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)
  • Re: asdf unload-op ??
    ... symbols from this package, and to forget this package name and nicknames. ... LISP> ... LISP> (delete-package:exemple) ... first time, and as #:FUN the second time. ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)
  • Re: asdf unload-op ??
    ... and what about if I unintern all symbols in package and then ... Pascal Bourguignon wrote: ... intern them again after delete-package. ... Nobody can fix the economy. ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)