comp.lang.lisp

• Thread Index

---

• Re: Matlab to Lisp converter?
  • From: zergling
• [PATCH] asdf: load-op after load-source-op
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: More questions about exported symbols and general style.
  • From: Ken Tilton
• Re: Stack overflow in relatively simple programs
  • From: Dan Bensen
• Re: Stack overflow in relatively simple programs
  • From: Timofei Shatrov
• Re: Stack overflow in relatively simple programs
  • From: fairchild . anthony
• Re: Stack overflow in relatively simple programs
  • From: Pascal Bourguignon
• Re: Stack overflow in relatively simple programs
  • From: Dan Bensen
• Re: Stack overflow in relatively simple programs
  • From: fairchild . anthony
• Stack overflow in relatively simple programs
  • From: robinganemccalla@xxxxxxxxx
• Matlab to Lisp converter?
  • From: pbunyk
• Re: How to write a Jihad program in Lisp???
  • From: Pascal Costanza
• Re: Save a class into xml file?
  • From: nallen05
• job advertisement for research programmer
  • From: Tolga Konik
• Re: funcallable-standard-class question
  • From: Steven Haflich
• Re: a small SBCL question
  • From: Zach Beane
• Re: a small SBCL question
  • From: Zach Beane
• Re: a small SBCL question
  • From: pbunyk
• Re: a small SBCL question
  • From: Pascal Bourguignon
• Re: a small SBCL question
  • From: dneu
• Re: CLISP + Araneida issues.
  • From: nhabedi
• CLISP + Araneida issues.
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: a small SBCL question
  • From: Robert Uhl
• Re: Save a class into xml file?
  • From: eli . cox
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Juan R.
• Programming Paradigms in Lisp by Rajeev Sangal
  • From: Pedro Kroger
• Re: What about these?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: What about these?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: a small SBCL question
  • From: Harald Hanche-Olsen
• Re: Anyone persuaded by "merits of Lisp vs Python"?
  • From: Bruce Nagel
• Re: Save a class into xml file?
  • From: David E. Young
• Re: flattening a nested lisp functionally
  • From: dpapathanasiou
• Re: What about these?
  • From: Pascal Bourguignon
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Rob Thorpe
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Rob Thorpe
• Re: What about these?
  • From: John Thingstad
• Re: What about these?
  • From: Madhu
• Re: What about these?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: What about these?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Jon Harrop
• Re: What about these?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: What about these?
  • From: John Thingstad
• Re: What about these?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: What about these?
  • From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
• porting Qi from CMUCL to SBCL
  • From: Mark Tarver
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Madhu
• Re: Save a class into xml file?
  • From: Bill Atkins
• Re: a small SBCL question
  • From: David Steuber
• Re: What about these?
  • From: Andy Freeman
• Re: a small SBCL question
  • From: Tim X
• Save a class into xml file?
  • From: eli . cox
• Re: a small SBCL question
  • From: TorvoSollazzo@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: What about these?
  • From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
• Re: a small SBCL question
  • From: Pascal Bourguignon
• Re: a small SBCL question
  • From: pbunyk
• Re: a small SBCL question
  • From: Zach Beane
• a small SBCL question
  • From: TorvoSollazzo@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: What about these?
  • From: Pascal Bourguignon
• Re: What about these?
  • From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
• Re: a bug in SBCL 1.0 under Windows?
  • From: Pascal Bourguignon
• Re: What about these?
  • From: Andy Freeman
• Re: Why is Clisp not used for comp sci at universities?
  • From: Pascal Costanza
• Re: Why is Clisp not used for comp sci at universities?
  • From: Timofei Shatrov
• Re: Why is Clisp not used for comp sci at universities?
  • From: Ruben Garcia Martin
• Re: What about these?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: What about these?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: a bug in SBCL 1.0 under Windows?
  • From: Mark Tarver
• Re: a bug in SBCL 1.0 under Windows?
  • From: Juho Snellman
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: What about these?
  • From: Vityok
• Re: lisp and youtube
  • From: Timofei Shatrov
• Re: What are some things lisp can do that smalltalk can't?
  • From: gavino
• Re: Why is Clisp not used for comp sci at universities?
  • From: gavino
• Re: (* 2.4 3) => 7.2000003 WTF?! Let's Fix Lisp! Noob Programming Challenge
  • From: mark.hoemmen@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Checksum (noob)
  • From: Damien Kick
• Re: Checksum (noob)
  • From: Peter Scott
• a bug in SBCL 1.0 under Windows?
  • From: Mark Tarver
• Re: Checksum (noob)
  • From: Bill Atkins
• Re: Checksum (noob)
  • From: Zach Beane
• Re: how to write a ''multiple characters' macro character' ?
  • From: Pascal Bourguignon
• slime and clisp: any way to get stack trace info?
  • From: Aaron Solochek
• Re: which one of these with-gensym implementations is better?
  • From: Alan Crowe
• Checksum (noob)
  • From: atgraham@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: lisp and youtube
  • From: klaus
• Re: More questions about exported symbols and general style.
  • From: Pascal Costanza
• Re: More questions about exported symbols and general style.
  • From: Bill Atkins
• how to write a ''multiple characters' macro character' ?
  • From: noteed
• Re: What about these?
  • From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
• Re: More questions about exported symbols and general style.
  • From: Pillsy
• Re: More questions about exported symbols and general style.
  • From: Bill Atkins
• Re: flattening a nested list functionally
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: More questions about exported symbols and general style.
  • From: Pillsy
• Re: More questions about exported symbols and general style.
  • From: Zach Beane
• More questions about exported symbols and general style.
  • From: Pillsy
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Wade Humeniuk
• Re: finding color support of emacs for editing lisp
  • From: billc
• Re: funcallable-standard-class question
  • From: Pascal Costanza
• Re: What about these?
  • From: Andy Freeman
• Re: funcallable-standard-class question
  • From: Michal Krupka
• Re: finding color support of emacs for editing lisp
  • From: stassats
• Re: funcallable-standard-class question
  • From: Pascal Costanza
• Re: which one of these with-gensym implementations is better?
  • From: Ravi
• funcallable-standard-class question
  • From: Michal Krupka
• Re: What about these?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: What about these?
  • From: Juan R.
• finding color support of emacs for editing lisp
  • From: Ronald
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: What about these?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: What about these?
  • From: Tim X
• Re: which one of these with-gensym implementations is better?
  • From: Rob Warnock
• Re: Editor support for refactoring with macros?
  • From: Pascal Bourguignon
• Re: Editor support for refactoring with macros?
  • From: phr
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Wade Humeniuk
• Re: UNDEFINED-FUNCTION error on calling an interned function name from a string
  • From: Frank Goenninger DG1SBG
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Wade Humeniuk
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: What about these?
  • From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
• Re: strange results when obtaining a package's symbols
  • From: Barry Margolin
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Don Geddis
• Re: UNDEFINED-FUNCTION error on calling an interned function name from a string
  • From: hit_the_lights
• which one of these with-gensym implementations is better?
  • From: cmo
• Re: What about these?
  • From: Juan R.
• UNDEFINED-FUNCTION error on calling an interned function name from a string
  • From: Frank Goenninger DG1SBG
• Re: ((quote (list 1 2 3))) is wrong ?
  • From: Pillsy
• Re: Editor support for refactoring with macros?
  • From: Pascal Bourguignon
• Re: ((quote (list 1 2 3))) is wrong ?
  • From: Ronald
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: ((quote (list 1 2 3))) is wrong ?
  • From: sailormoontw@xxxxxxxxx
• ((quote (list 1 2 3))) is wrong ?
  • From: Ronald
• Re: Any different? '(1 2) (list 1 2)
  • From: mikel@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Why the same result?
  • From: Sam Steingold
• Re: Why the same result?
  • From: mikel@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Any different? '(1 2) (list 1 2)
  • From: Sam Steingold
• Why the same result?
  • From: Ronald
• Any different? '(1 2) (list 1 2)
  • From: Ronald
• Re: (* 2.4 3) => 7.2000003 WTF?! Let's Fix Lisp! Noob Programming Challenge
  • From: Kirk Sluder
• Re: What about these?
  • From: Tim X
• Re: CLISP socket binding loopy?
  • From: David Trudgett
• Re: (* 2.4 3) => 7.2000003 WTF?! Let's Fix Lisp! Noob Programming Challenge
  • From: Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
• Re: CLISP socket binding loopy?
  • From: Sam Steingold
• Editor support for refactoring with macros?
  • From: phr
• CLISP socket binding loopy?
  • From: David Trudgett
• Re: strange results when obtaining a package's symbols
  • From: Zach Beane
• Re: strange results when obtaining a package's symbols
  • From: jakemiles
• Re: strange results when obtaining a package's symbols
  • From: Barry Margolin
• strange results when obtaining a package's symbols
  • From: jakemiles
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Bob Felts
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Wade Humeniuk
• Re: lisp and youtube
  • From: Bulent Murtezaoglu
• Re: (* 2.4 3) => 7.2000003 WTF?! Let's Fix Lisp! Noob Programming Challenge
  • From: Kirk Sluder
• Re: lisp and youtube
  • From: Barry Margolin
• Re: lisp and youtube
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: lisp and youtube
  • From: Guillaume Cartier
• Re: What about these?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: What about these?
  • From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
• Re: What about these?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: What about these?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Juan R.
• lisp and youtube
  • From: Jimka
• Re: (* 2.4 3) => 7.2000003 WTF?! Let's Fix Lisp! Noob Programming Challenge
  • From: Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
• Re: (* 2.4 3) => 7.2000003 WTF?! Let's Fix Lisp! Noob Programming Challenge
  • From: Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
• Re: What about these?
  • From: Tim X
• Re: (* 2.4 3) => 7.2000003 WTF?! Let's Fix Lisp! Noob Programming Challenge
  • From: Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
• Re: (* 2.4 3) => 7.2000003 WTF?! Let's Fix Lisp! Noob Programming Challenge
  • From: Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
• Re: (* 2.4 3) => 7.2000003 WTF?! Let's Fix Lisp! Noob Programming Challenge
  • From: Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
• Re: Mighty strange slime error
  • From: alexey.goldin@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: (* 2.4 3) => 7.2000003 WTF?! Let's Fix Lisp! Noob Programming Challenge
  • From: Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
• Mighty strange slime error
  • From: alexey.goldin@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: reader safe
  • From: Rob Warnock
• Re: (* 2.4 3) => 7.2000003 WTF?! Let's Fix Lisp! Noob Programming Challenge
  • From: Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
• Re: reader safe
  • From: Richard M Kreuter
• Re: what flet doesn't work here??
  • From: Rob Warnock
• Re: What about these?
  • From: Pillsy
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Don Geddis
• Re: What about these?
  • From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
• Re: reader safe
  • From: Richard M Kreuter
• Re: reader safe
  • From: Greg Johnston
• Re: (newbie) help with 'with-gensyms' required
  • From: Bill Atkins
• Re: reader safe
  • From: Pascal Costanza
• Re: reader safe
  • From: Wade Humeniuk
• Re: what flet doesn't work here??
  • From: Ron Garret
• Re: reader safe
  • From: Alex Mizrahi
• Re: reader safe
  • From: Wade Humeniuk
• Re: reader safe
  • From: Pascal Costanza
• Re: reader safe
  • From: Pascal Costanza
• Re: reader safe
  • From: Alex Mizrahi
• Re: reader safe
  • From: Wade Humeniuk
• reader safe
  • From: Alex Mizrahi
• Re: (newbie) help with 'with-gensyms' required
  • From: Alex Mizrahi
• Re: (newbie) help with 'with-gensyms' required
  • From: Bill Atkins
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Wade Humeniuk
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Pascal Bourguignon
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Bob Felts
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: What about these?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: submitting lisp programs to programming-challenges.com
  • From: Mark Tarver
• Re: what flet doesn't work here??
  • From: Pascal Costanza
• Re: (newbie) help with 'with-gensyms' required
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: submitting lisp programs to programming-challenges.com
  • From: memius
• Re: submitting lisp programs to programming-challenges.com
  • From: furious_joe
• Re: How to suppress asdf warnings
  • From: furious_joe
• Re: What about these?
  • From: Tim X
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: what flet doesn't work here??
  • From: Ron Garret
• Re: what flet doesn't work here??
  • From: Pascal Costanza
• Re: what flet doesn't work here??
  • From: Rob Warnock
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Pascal Bourguignon
• Re: (newbie) help with 'with-gensyms' required
  • From: Zach Beane
• (newbie) help with 'with-gensyms' required
  • From: SnowGhost
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Bob Felts
• Re: what flet doesn't work here??
  • From: Ron Garret
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Wade Humeniuk
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Bob Felts
• Re: What about these?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: What about these?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: What about these?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: (* 2.4 3) => 7.2000003 WTF?! Let's Fix Lisp! Noob Programming Challenge
  • From: William D Clinger
• How to suppress asdf warnings
  • From: jmckitrick
• Re: submitting lisp programs to programming-challenges.com
  • From: Mark Tarver
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Bob Felts
• Re: What about these?
  • From: Andrew Reilly
• Copying cl-cookbook to wikibook - ideas, feedback, contributions...
  • From: Emre Sevinc
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: submitting lisp programs to programming-challenges.com
  • From: Pascal Bourguignon
• Re: What about these?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: What about these?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: what flet doesn't work here??
  • From: Michal Krupka
• Re: what flet doesn't work here??
  • From: Rob Warnock
• Re: what flet doesn't work here??
  • From: sailormoontw@xxxxxxxxx
• submitting lisp programs to programming-challenges.com
  • From: memius
• Re: what flet doesn't work here??
  • From: Michal Krupka
• what flet doesn't work here??
  • From: sailormoontw@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: asdf component not found
  • From: jakemiles
• Re: asdf component not found
  • From: Zach Beane
• Re: comparison of objects
  • From: Rainer Joswig
• asdf component not found
  • From: jakemiles
• Re: comparison of objects
  • From: Maciek Pasternacki
• Re: What about these?
  • From: Raffael Cavallaro
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Ken Tilton
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Andy Freeman
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Wade Humeniuk
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Bob Felts
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Jon Harrop
• Re: with added methods
  • From: Troels Henriksen
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Sacha
• Re: comparison of objects
  • From: Rainer Joswig
• Re: (* 2.4 3) => 7.2000003 WTF?! Let's Fix Lisp! Noob Programming Challenge
  • From: Thomas A. Russ
• Re: What about these?
  • From: Thomas A. Russ
• Re: What about these?
  • From: Thomas A. Russ
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: What about these?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: (* 2.4 3) => 7.2000003 WTF?! Let's Fix Lisp! Noob Programming Challenge
  • From: Thomas A. Russ
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Jon Harrop
• Re: comparison of objects
  • From: Maciek Pasternacki
• Re: What about these?
  • From: John Thingstad
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Jon Harrop
• Re: What about these?
  • From: Pillsy
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: What about these?
  • From: Juan R.
• repl font-lock
  • From: Dmitry V. Gorbatovsky
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Jon Harrop
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Jon Harrop
• Re: (* 2.4 3) => 7.2000003 WTF?! Let's Fix Lisp! Noob Programming Challenge
  • From: Pascal Bourguignon
• Re: A Gödel number Lisp (primitive recursive functions fun)
  • From: Pascal Bourguignon
• Re: What about these?
  • From: John Thingstad
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: (* 2.4 3) => 7.2000003 WTF?! Let's Fix Lisp! Noob Programming Challenge
  • From: dixkey
• Re: What about these?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: What about these?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: What about these?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: What about these?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: What about these?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: What about these?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: (* 2.4 3) => 7.2000003 WTF?! Let's Fix Lisp! Noob Programming Challenge
  • From: mark.hoemmen@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: announcement: Maxima 5.11.0 release
  • From: Bernd Schmitt
• Re: (* 2.4 3) => 7.2000003 WTF?! Let's Fix Lisp! Noob Programming Challenge
  • From: Ken Tilton
• Re: What about these?
  • From: Tim Bradshaw
• Re: A Gödel number Lisp (primitive recursive functions fun)
  • From: Javier
• Re: What about these?
  • From: Thomas A. Russ
• Re: (* 2.4 3) => 7.2000003 WTF?! Let's Fix Lisp! Noob Programming Challenge
  • From: Thomas A. Russ
• Re: A Gödel number Lisp (primitive recursive functions fun)
  • From: Marc Battyani
• Re: A Gödel number Lisp (primitive recursive functions fun)
  • From: nvt
• Re: A Gödel number Lisp (primitive recursive functions fun)
  • From: nvt
• Re: There's Gotta Be A Better Way #3: To One Or Not To One
  • From: William James
• Re: (* 2.4 3) => 7.2000003 WTF?! Let's Fix Lisp! Noob Programming Challenge
  • From: Frode Vatvedt Fjeld
• Re: What about these?
  • From: Ken Tilton
• Re: What about these?
  • From: Javier
• Re: with added methods
  • From: Pascal Costanza
• Re: What about these?
  • From: Sidney Markowitz
• Re: ANNOUNCE: Bosco 0.7 Available
  • From: John Thingstad
• Re: ANNOUNCE: Bosco 0.7 Available
  • From: Rainer Joswig
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Pascal Bourguignon
• Re: What about these?
  • From: John Thingstad
• Re: What about these?
  • From: Pillsy
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: floating point error when messing with GTK+
  • From: Lars Rune Nøstdal
• Re: floating point error when messing with GTK+
  • From: alexey.goldin@xxxxxxxxx
• with added methods
  • From: Jim Newton
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Jon Harrop
• Re: What about these?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: floating point error when messing with GTK+
  • From: Lars Rune Nøstdal
• Re: Encoding problem with copying from pdf and pasting to emacs
  • From: Pascal Bourguignon
• Re: floating point error when messing with GTK+
  • From: alexey.goldin@xxxxxxxxx
• Encoding problem with copying from pdf and pasting to emacs
  • From: Trastabuga
• Re: floating point error when messing with GTK+
  • From: Lars Rune Nøstdal
• Re: floating point error when messing with GTK+
  • From: Lars Rune Nøstdal
• Re: method-let
  • From: Pascal Bourguignon
• Re: (* 2.4 3) => 7.2000003 WTF?! Let's Fix Lisp! Noob Programming Challenge
  • From: MarkHaniford@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: What about these?
  • From: Tim Bradshaw
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Neil Cerutti
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Rob Thorpe
• Re: What about these?
  • From: roland . kaufmann
• Re: floating point error when messing with GTK+
  • From: Lars Rune Nøstdal
• Re: (* 2.4 3) => 7.2000003 WTF?! Let's Fix Lisp! Noob Programming Challenge
  • From: Frank Buss
• Re: floating point error when messing with GTK+
  • From: Luigi Panzeri
• Re: Hunchentoot vs. Portable Allegroserve
  • From: Maciek Pasternacki
• floating point error when messing with GTK+
  • From: Lars Rune Nøstdal
• Re: (* 2.4 3) => 7.2000003 WTF?! Let's Fix Lisp! Noob Programming Challenge
  • From: Debian User
• Re: (* 2.4 3) => 7.2000003 WTF?! Let's Fix Lisp! Noob Programming Challenge
  • From: Greg Menke
• Re: What about these?
  • From: Tim Bradshaw
• Re: ANNOUNCE: Bosco 0.7 Available
  • From: Andrew Reilly
• Re: What about these?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: (* 2.4 3) => 7.2000003 WTF?! Let's Fix Lisp! Noob Programming Challenge
  • From: Tim Bradshaw
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: (* 2.4 3) => 7.2000003 WTF?! Let's Fix Lisp! Noob Programming Challenge
  • From: Tim Bradshaw
• Re: What about these?
  • From: Tim Bradshaw
• Re: What about these?
  • From: Tim Bradshaw
• Re: What about these?
  • From: Tim Bradshaw
• Re: What about these?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: ANNOUNCE: Bosco 0.7 Available
  • From: George Neuner
• Re: method-let
  • From: Pascal Costanza
• Re: (* 2.4 3) => 7.2000003 WTF?! Let's Fix Lisp! Noob Programming Challenge
  • From: mark.hoemmen@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: (* 2.4 3) => 7.2000003 WTF?! Let's Fix Lisp! Noob Programming Challenge
  • From: mark.hoemmen@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: method-let
  • From: nhabedi
• Re: method-let
  • From: Raffael Cavallaro
• Re: There's Gotta Be A Better Way #3: To One Or Not To One
  • From: GP lisper
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: JShrager@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: (* 2.4 3) => 7.2000003 WTF?! Let's Fix Lisp! Noob Programming Challenge
  • From: George Neuner
• method-let
  • From: nallen05
• Re: There's Gotta Be A Better Way #3: To One Or Not To One
  • From: Ken Tilton
• Re: ANNOUNCE: Bosco 0.7 Available
  • From: Pascal Bourguignon
• Re: There's Gotta Be A Better Way #3: To One Or Not To One
  • From: nallen05
• Re: (* 2.4 3) => 7.2000003 WTF?! Let's Fix Lisp! Noob Programming Challenge
  • From: Damien Kick
• Re: ANNOUNCE: Bosco 0.7 Available
  • From: John Thingstad
• Re: Why does this cons so much?
  • From: Ivan Boldyrev
• Re: ANNOUNCE: Bosco 0.7 Available
  • From: Ralph Richard Cook
• Re: Common Lisp from a Unix perspective - barriers to using CL
  • From: sailormoontw@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: tricks that made you grin or grimace
  • From: Pillsy
• Re: What about these?
  • From: Ken Tilton
• Re: (* 2.4 3) => 7.2000003 WTF?! Let's Fix Lisp! Noob Programming Challenge
  • From: Rob Warnock
• Re: (* 2.4 3) => 7.2000003 WTF?! Let's Fix Lisp! Noob Programming Challenge
  • From: Kirk Sluder
• Re: tricks that made you grin or grimace
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: There's Gotta Be A Better Way #3: To One Or Not To One
  • From: Rob Warnock
• Re: What about these?
  • From: John Thingstad
• Re: What about these?
  • From: Ken Tilton
• Re: (* 2.4 3) => 7.2000003 WTF?! Let's Fix Lisp! Noob Programming Challenge
  • From: Ron Garret
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: jayessay
• Re: (* 2.4 3) => 7.2000003 WTF?! Let's Fix Lisp! Noob Programming Challenge
  • From: Joe Marshall
• Re: (* 2.4 3) => 7.2000003 WTF?! Let's Fix Lisp! Noob Programming Challenge
  • From: Andrew Reilly
• Qi under CMU Lisp 19c - prerelease timings - CLisp and CMU
  • From: Mark Tarver
• Re: (* 2.4 3) => 7.2000003 WTF?! Let's Fix Lisp! Noob Programming Challenge
  • From: Marc Battyani
• Re: What about these?
  • From: Andrew Reilly
• Re: (* 2.4 3) => 7.2000003 WTF?! Let's Fix Lisp! Noob Programming Challenge
  • From: Marc Battyani
• Re: Why does this cons so much?
  • From: Juho Snellman
• Re: (* 2.4 3) => 7.2000003 WTF?! Let's Fix Lisp! Noob Programming Challenge
  • From: Frode Vatvedt Fjeld
• Re: Hunchentoot vs. Portable Allegroserve
  • From: dpapathanasiou
• Poor man's partial evaluator
  • From: levy
• Re: Macro dependency tracking
  • From: Ken Tilton
• Re: (* 2.4 3) => 7.2000003 WTF?! Let's Fix Lisp! Noob Programming Challenge
  • From: Ron Garret
• Re: Macro dependency tracking
  • From: levy
• Hunchentoot vs. Portable Allegroserve
  • From: Giorgos Pontikakis
• Re: Macro dependency tracking
  • From: Ken Tilton
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Jon Harrop
• Re: (* 2.4 3) => 7.2000003 WTF?! Let's Fix Lisp! Noob Programming Challenge
  • From: Frode Vatvedt Fjeld
• Re: (* 2.4 3) => 7.2000003 WTF?! Let's Fix Lisp! Noob Programming Challenge
  • From: Ron Garret
• ANNOUNCE: Bosco 0.7 Available
  • From: mikel@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: (* 2.4 3) => 7.2000003 WTF?! Let's Fix Lisp! Noob Programming Challenge
  • From: smallpond
• Re: eclipse and cusp
  • From: Texaner
• eclipse and cusp
  • From: Texaner
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Jon Harrop
• Macro dependency tracking
  • From: levy
• Re: Why does this cons so much?
  • From: js
• Re: (* 2.4 3) => 7.2000003 WTF?! Let's Fix Lisp! Noob Programming Challenge
  • From: n2kra
• Re: (* 2.4 3) => 7.2000003 WTF?! Let's Fix Lisp! Noob Programming Challenge
  • From: Kirk Sluder
• Re: (* 2.4 3) => 7.2000003 WTF?! Let's Fix Lisp! Noob Programming Challenge
  • From: Frode Vatvedt Fjeld
• Re: (* 2.4 3) => 7.2000003 WTF?! Let's Fix Lisp! Noob Programming Challenge
  • From: Ron Garret
• Re: (* 2.4 3) => 7.2000003 WTF?! Let's Fix Lisp! Noob Programming Challenge
  • From: smallpond
• Re: (* 2.4 3) => 7.2000003 WTF?! Let's Fix Lisp! Noob Programming Challenge
  • From: Kirk Sluder
• Re: (* 2.4 3) => 7.2000003 WTF?! Let's Fix Lisp! Noob Programming Challenge
  • From: Ken Tilton
• Re: (* 2.4 3) => 7.2000003 WTF?! Let's Fix Lisp! Noob Programming Challenge
  • From: Kirk Sluder
• Re: (* 2.4 3) => 7.2000003 WTF?! Let's Fix Lisp! Noob Programming Challenge
  • From: John Thingstad
• Re: (* 2.4 3) => 7.2000003 WTF?! Let's Fix Lisp! Noob Programming Challenge
  • From: Kirk Sluder
• Why does this cons so much?
  • From: Pillsy
• Re: Common Lisp from a Unix perspective - barriers to using CL
  • From: Robert Uhl
• Re: There's Gotta Be A Better Way #3: To One Or Not To One
  • From: Ron Garret
• Re: (* 2.4 3) => 7.2000003 WTF?! Let's Fix Lisp! Noob Programming Challenge
  • From: smallpond
• Re: (* 2.4 3) => 7.2000003 WTF?! Let's Fix Lisp! Noob Programming Challenge
  • From: Ron Garret
• Re: comparison of objects
  • From: Thomas A. Russ
• Re: Symbols, symbol names, packages and exporting: which to use?
  • From: Thomas A. Russ
• Interval list
  • From: Geoffrey Summerhayes
• Re: (* 2.4 3) => 7.2000003 WTF?! Let's Fix Lisp! Noob Programming Challenge
  • From: Kirk Sluder
• Re: (* 2.4 3) => 7.2000003 WTF?! Let's Fix Lisp! Noob Programming Challenge
  • From: John Thingstad
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Rob Thorpe
• Re: There's Gotta Be A Better Way #3: To One Or Not To One
  • From: Ken Tilton
• Re: (* 2.4 3) => 7.2000003 WTF?! Let's Fix Lisp! Noob Programming Challenge
  • From: Timofei Shatrov
• Re: (* 2.4 3) => 7.2000003 WTF?! Let's Fix Lisp! Noob Programming Challenge
  • From: Ken Tilton
• Re: (* 2.4 3) => 7.2000003 WTF?! Let's Fix Lisp! Noob Programming Challenge
  • From: Kirk Sluder
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Timofei Shatrov
• Re: What about these?
  • From: Tim Bradshaw
• Re: (* 2.4 3) => 7.2000003 WTF?! Let's Fix Lisp! Noob Programming Challenge
  • From: Tim Bradshaw
• Re: There's Gotta Be A Better Way #3: To One Or Not To One
  • From: Paul Griffioen
• Re: There's Gotta Be A Better Way #3: To One Or Not To One
  • From: Ken Tilton
• Re: There's Gotta Be A Better Way #3: To One Or Not To One
  • From: Neil Cerutti
• Re: There's Gotta Be A Better Way #3: To One Or Not To One
  • From: Ken Tilton
• Re: There's Gotta Be A Better Way #3: To One Or Not To One
  • From: Ken Tilton
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Neil Cerutti
• Re: There's Gotta Be A Better Way #3: To One Or Not To One
  • From: Neil Cerutti
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Rob Thorpe
• Re: (* 2.4 3) => 7.2000003 WTF?! Let's Fix Lisp! Noob Programming Challenge
  • From: Ken Tilton
• Re: (* 2.4 3) => 7.2000003 WTF?! Let's Fix Lisp! Noob Programming Challenge
  • From: Ken Tilton
• Re: (* 2.4 3) => 7.2000003 WTF?! Let's Fix Lisp! Noob Programming Challenge
  • From: Ken Tilton
• Re: (* 2.4 3) => 7.2000003 WTF?! Let's Fix Lisp! Noob Programming Challenge
  • From: John Thingstad
• Re: (* 2.4 3) => 7.2000003 WTF?! Let's Fix Lisp! Noob Programming Challenge
  • From: John Thingstad
• Re: There's Gotta Be A Better Way #3: To One Or Not To One
  • From: Ken Tilton
• Re: There's Gotta Be A Better Way #3: To One Or Not To One
  • From: Wade Humeniuk
• Re: Qi under CMU Lisp 19c - prerelease by request
  • From: André Thieme
• Re: (* 2.4 3) => 7.2000003 WTF?! Let's Fix Lisp! Noob Programming Challenge
  • From: Ken Tilton
• Re: There's Gotta Be A Better Way #3: To One Or Not To One
  • From: Ken Tilton
• Re: What about these?
  • From: Ken Tilton
• Re: There's Gotta Be A Better Way #3: To One Or Not To One
  • From: Bill Atkins
• Re: How do I prevent double quotes from showing up in formatted strings ?
  • From: jurgen_defurne
• Re: How do I prevent double quotes from showing up in formatted strings ?
  • From: Lars Rune Nøstdal
• How do I prevent double quotes from showing up in formatted strings ?
  • From: jurgen_defurne
• Re: There's Gotta Be A Better Way #3: To One Or Not To One
  • From: André Thieme
• Re: tricks that made you grin or grimace
  • From: Zach Beane
• Re: (* 2.4 3) => 7.2000003 WTF?! Let's Fix Lisp! Noob Programming Challenge
  • From: André Thieme
• Re: There's Gotta Be A Better Way #3: To One Or Not To One
  • From: Matley
• Re: tricks that made you grin or grimace
  • From: Pillsy
• Re: There's Gotta Be A Better Way #3: To One Or Not To One
  • From: Rob Warnock
• Re: tricks that made you grin or grimace
  • From: Zach Beane
• Re: tricks that made you grin or grimace
  • From: Rob Warnock
• Re: What about these?
  • From: Tim Bradshaw
• Re: tricks that made you grin or grimace
  • From: Tim Bradshaw
• Re: There's Gotta Be A Better Way #3: To One Or Not To One
  • From: Paul Griffioen
• Re: There's Gotta Be A Better Way #3: To One Or Not To One
  • From: Tim Bradshaw
• Re: (* 2.4 3) => 7.2000003 WTF?! Let's Fix Lisp! Noob Programming Challenge
  • From: Frode Vatvedt Fjeld
• Re: (* 2.4 3) => 7.2000003 WTF?! Let's Fix Lisp! Noob Programming Challenge
  • From: Tim Bradshaw
• Re: There's Gotta Be A Better Way #3: To One Or Not To One
  • From: William James
• Re: A Gödel number Lisp (primitive recursive functions fun)
  • From: Marc Battyani
• Re: A Gödel number Lisp (primitive recursive functions fun)
  • From: Marc Battyani
• Re: A Gödel number Lisp (primitive recursive functions fun)
  • From: Marc Battyani
• Re: (* 2.4 3) => 7.2000003 WTF?! Let's Fix Lisp! Noob Programming Challenge
  • From: Ken Tilton
• Re: There's Gotta Be A Better Way #3: To One Or Not To One
  • From: Ron Garret
• Re: There's Gotta Be A Better Way #3: To One Or Not To One
  • From: Ken Tilton
• Re: (* 2.4 3) => 7.2000003 WTF?! Let's Fix Lisp! Noob Programming Challenge
  • From: Andrew Reilly
• Re: (* 2.4 3) => 7.2000003 WTF?! Let's Fix Lisp! Noob Programming Challenge
  • From: Ron Garret
• Re: (* 2.4 3) => 7.2000003 WTF?! Let's Fix Lisp! Noob Programming Challenge
  • From: Ken Tilton
• Re: There's Gotta Be A Better Way #3: To One Or Not To One
  • From: Ken Tilton
• Re: (* 2.4 3) => 7.2000003 WTF?! Let's Fix Lisp! Noob Programming Challenge
  • From: John Thingstad
• (* 2.4 3) => 7.2000003 WTF?! Let's Fix Lisp! Noob Programming Challenge
  • From: Ken Tilton
• Re: There's Gotta Be A Better Way #3: To One Or Not To One
  • From: Alain Picard
• Re: There's Gotta Be A Better Way #3: To One Or Not To One
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: There's Gotta Be A Better Way #3: To One Or Not To One
  • From: Robert Strandh
• There's Gotta Be A Better Way #3: To One Or Not To One
  • From: Ken Tilton
• Re: tricks that made you grin or grimace
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: A Gödel number Lisp (primitive recursive functions fun)
  • From: Ivan Boldyrev
• Re: tricks that made you grin or grimace
  • From: Pillsy
• Re: Common Lisp from a Unix perspective - barriers to using CL
  • From: josephoswaldgg@xxxxxxxxxxx
• tricks that made you grin or grimace
  • From: Zach Beane
• Re: Common Lisp from a Unix perspective - barriers to using CL
  • From: tutufan@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Package-qualified symbols & unUSEable packages -- threat or menace?
  • From: Zach Beane
• Re: That was quick, and a meta-quote!
  • From: Ken Tilton
• Re: That was quick, and a meta-quote!
  • From: Rob Warnock
• Re: Qi under CMU Lisp 19c - prerelease by request
  • From: Mark Tarver
• Re: A Gödel number Lisp (primitive recursive functions fun)
  • From: nvt
• Re: Symbols, symbol names, packages and exporting: which to use?
  • From: Pillsy
• Re: MontyLingua - CL version
  • From: John Thingstad
• Re: Qi under CMU Lisp 19c - prerelease by request
  • From: Mark Tarver
• Qi under CMU Lisp 19c - prerelease by request
  • From: Mark Tarver
• Re: Package-qualified symbols & unUSEable packages -- threat or menace?
  • From: Richard M Kreuter
• Re: A Gödel number Lisp (primitive recursive functions fun)
  • From: Pascal Bourguignon
• Re: MontyLingua - CL version
  • From: Holger Schauer
• [ANNOUNCE] ACBL-web 0.0.0: a web-framework using Armed Bear Common Lisp as a Java Servlet
  • From: Alex Mizrahi
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Jon Harrop
• Re: Oops. That was quick, I was too quick...
  • From: Ken Tilton
• Re: What about these?
  • From: Ken Tilton
• Re: Oops. That was quick, I was too quick...
  • From: Trastabuga
• Re: What about these?
  • From: Pillsy
• Oops. That was quick, I was too quick...
  • From: Ken Tilton
• That was quick, and a meta-quote!
  • From: Ken Tilton
• Re: What about these?
  • From: Ken Tilton
• Re: What about these?
  • From: Nicolas Neuss
• Re: Package-qualified symbols & unUSEable packages -- threat or menace?
  • From: jayessay
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Neil Cerutti
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Ron Garret
• Re: Package-qualified symbols & unUSEable packages -- threat or menace?
  • From: Pascal Costanza
• Re: Package-qualified symbols & unUSEable packages -- threat or menace?
  • From: Tim Bradshaw
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Ron Garret
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Markus Grueneis
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Rob Thorpe
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Neil Cerutti
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Tim Bradshaw
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: jayessay
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: jayessay
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Markus Grueneis
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Neil Cerutti
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Jon Harrop
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Jon Harrop
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Jon Harrop
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: jayessay
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Manuel Giraud
• A Gödel number Lisp (primitive recursive functions fun)
  • From: Marc Battyani
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Neil Cerutti
• Re: Package-qualified symbols & unUSEable packages -- threat or menace?
  • From: js
• Re: Package-qualified symbols & unUSEable packages -- threat or menace?
  • From: js
• Re: Symbols, symbol names, packages and exporting: which to use?
  • From: Tim Bradshaw
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Pascal Bourguignon
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Pascal Bourguignon
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Pascal Bourguignon
• Re: Package-qualified symbols & unUSEable packages -- threat or menace?
  • From: Tim Bradshaw
• Re: What about these?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Future of LISP. Alternative to XML. Web 3.0?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Future of LISP. Alternative to XML. Web 3.0?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Harald Hanche-Olsen
• Re: Announcing Dialogue 1.0
  • From: Paolo Amoroso
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Pascal Costanza
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Juan R.
• What about these?
  • From: Ken Tilton
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Ken Tilton
• Re: Symbols, symbol names, packages and exporting: which to use?
  • From: Harald Hanche-Olsen
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: xscottg
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Ken Tilton
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: xscottg
• Re: Package-qualified symbols & unUSEable packages -- threat or menace?
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Ron Garret
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Wade Humeniuk
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: xscottg
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Wade Humeniuk
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: John Thingstad
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: John Thingstad
• Re: Symbols, symbol names, packages and exporting: which to use?
  • From: John Thingstad
• Re: Symbols, symbol names, packages and exporting: which to use?
  • From: Bill Atkins
• Re: Symbols, symbol names, packages and exporting: which to use?
  • From: John Thingstad
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Rob Warnock
• Re: Symbols, symbol names, packages and exporting: which to use?
  • From: John Thingstad
• Re: Symbols, symbol names, packages and exporting: which to use?
  • From: John Thingstad
• Re: Symbols, symbol names, packages and exporting: which to use?
  • From: Pascal Bourguignon
• Re: Symbols, symbol names, packages and exporting: which to use?
  • From: John Thingstad
• Re: Symbols, symbol names, packages and exporting: which to use?
  • From: John Thingstad
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Ron Garret
• Re: comparison of objects
  • From: Thomas A. Russ
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Jon Harrop
• Re: Package-qualified symbols & unUSEable packages -- threat or menace?
  • From: Richard M Kreuter
• Re: Symbols, symbol names, packages and exporting: which to use?
  • From: Harald Hanche-Olsen
• Re: Package-qualified symbols & unUSEable packages -- threat or menace?
  • From: Richard M Kreuter
• Re: Symbols, symbol names, packages and exporting: which to use?
  • From: Harold
• Re: Common Lisp from a Unix perspective - barriers to using CL
  • From: Robert Uhl
• Re: Announcing Dialogue 1.0
  • From: JShrager@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Package-qualified symbols & unUSEable packages -- threat or menace?
  • From: hit_the_lights
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: André Thieme
• Re: Announcing Dialogue 1.0
  • From: hyperstring.net ltd
• Re: http://sisal.sourceforge.net/ is sisal alive at all? any lisp library do things like concurrency?
  • From: gavino
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Jon Harrop
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: André Thieme
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: gpropf
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Jon Harrop
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: André Thieme
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: André Thieme
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Lars Rune Nøstdal
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Rob Thorpe
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Robert Uhl
• Re: Symbols, symbol names, packages and exporting: which to use?
  • From: Tim Bradshaw
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Pascal Costanza
• Symbols, symbol names, packages and exporting: which to use?
  • From: Pillsy
• Re: Lisp system construction
  • From: Ari Johnson
• Re: Why is Clisp not used for comp sci at universities?
  • From: anamax
• Re: openmosix, making computer into 1, process level, lisp
  • From: Tim Bradshaw
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Maciek Pasternacki
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Jon Harrop
• Re: comparison of objects
  • From: Zach Beane
• Re: Dvorak keyboard and Lisp
  • From: Francis Leboutte
• Lisp system construction
  • From: Jürgen Böhm
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: André Thieme
• Re: http://sisal.sourceforge.net/ is sisal alive at all? any lisp library do things like concurrency?
  • From: sailormoontw@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: comparison of objects
  • From: sailormoontw@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Package-qualified symbols & unUSEable packages -- threat or menace?
  • From: js
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Jon Harrop
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Jon Harrop
• Re: Why is Clisp not used for comp sci at universities?
  • From: Charlton Wilbur
• Re: comparison of objects
  • From: Andreas Thiele
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Maciek Pasternacki
• Re: comparison of objects
  • From: Pascal Bourguignon
• Re: lambda-returning defmacro, capture
  • From: Rob Warnock
• Re: Package-qualified symbols & unUSEable packages -- threat or menace?
  • From: Alex Mizrahi
• Re: comparison of objects
  • From: Leonardo Varuzza
• Re: Package-qualified symbols & unUSEable packages -- threat or menace?
  • From: Tim Bradshaw
• *** C.L.L README/FAQ ***
  • From: JShrager@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Syntax via macro characters.
  • From: Pillsy
• Re: lambda-returning defmacro, capture
  • From: Rob Warnock
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: André Thieme
• Re: Syntax via macro characters.
  • From: Andreas Thiele
• Re: Why is Clisp not used for comp sci at universities?
  • From: John Thingstad
• Re: http://sisal.sourceforge.net/ is sisal alive at all? any lisp library do things like concurrency?
  • From: Lars Rune Nøstdal
• Re: Why is Clisp not used for comp sci at universities?
  • From: Pascal Costanza
• Re: Compile to binary using gcl?
  • From: Rob Thorpe
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: André Thieme
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: André Thieme
• Re: Why is Clisp not used for comp sci at universities?
  • From: Florian Blatt
• Announcing Dialogue 1.0
  • From: Francis Leboutte
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: MarkHaniford@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Raffael Cavallaro
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Raffael Cavallaro
• Re: Package-qualified symbols & unUSEable packages -- threat or menace?
  • From: Thomas M. Hermann
• Re: comparison of objects
  • From: usenet
• Re: http://sisal.sourceforge.net/ is sisal alive at all? any lisp library do things like concurrency?
  • From: sailormoontw@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: comparison of objects
  • From: sailormoontw@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: John Thingstad
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: xscottg
• Re: Package-qualified symbols & unUSEable packages -- threat or menace?
  • From: Barry Margolin
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Jon Harrop
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Jon Harrop
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: xscottg
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Jon Harrop
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Wade Humeniuk
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Jon Harrop
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: xscottg
• Re: Package-qualified symbols & unUSEable packages -- threat or menace?
  • From: js
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Pascal Bourguignon
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: xscottg
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Wade Humeniuk
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Jon Harrop
• Re: Common Lisp from a Unix perspective - barriers to using CL
  • From: Kirk Sluder
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Bill Atkins
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Common Lisp from a Unix perspective - barriers to using CL
  • From: Kirk Sluder
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: MarkHaniford@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: MarkHaniford@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: MarkHaniford@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Package-qualified symbols & unUSEable packages -- threat or menace?
  • From: Pascal Bourguignon
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Pascal Bourguignon
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Pascal Bourguignon
• Re: Package-qualified symbols & unUSEable packages -- threat or menace?
  • From: Richard M Kreuter
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Jon Harrop
• Re: What are some things lisp can do that smalltalk can't?
  • From: rc
• Re: Package-qualified symbols & unUSEable packages -- threat or menace?
  • From: joswig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Jon Harrop
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Jon Harrop
• Re: The Right Editor for writing let (and other things) (was Re: N00b question on let)
  • From: joswig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Jon Harrop
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Jon Harrop
• Re: http://sisal.sourceforge.net/ is sisal alive at all? any lisp library do things like concurrency?
  • From: Lars Rune Nøstdal
• Re: package question
  • From: liyer . vijay
• Re: Package-qualified symbols & unUSEable packages -- threat or menace?
  • From: Pascal Bourguignon
• Package-qualified symbols & unUSEable packages -- threat or menace?
  • From: Richard M Kreuter
• Re: package question
  • From: Pascal Bourguignon
• Re: N00b question on let
  • From: David Douthitt
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: John Thingstad
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Pascal Bourguignon
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Pascal Bourguignon
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Ken Tilton
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Pascal Bourguignon
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Pascal Bourguignon
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Bill Atkins
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: xscottg
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Raffael Cavallaro
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Raffael Cavallaro
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: gpropf
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Ron Garret
• Re: BBL and vBBL: A Biologist's Visual Programming Language for BioBike
  • From: JShrager@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: MarkHaniford@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Bob Felts
• Re: Future of LISP. Alternative to XML. Web 3.0?
  • From: Toby
• Re: package question
  • From: liyer . vijay
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Bill Atkins
• Re: Why is Clisp not used for comp sci at universities?
  • From: grackle
• Re: Common Lisp from a Unix perspective - barriers to using CL
  • From: Bill Atkins
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: MarkHaniford@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Common Lisp from a Unix perspective - barriers to using CL
  • From: Raffael Cavallaro
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Raffael Cavallaro
• Re: What are some things lisp can do that smalltalk can't?
  • From: wooks
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Bill Atkins
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Raffael Cavallaro
• Re: http://sisal.sourceforge.net/ is sisal alive at all? any lisp library do things like concurrency?
  • From: Alex Mizrahi
• Re: What are some things lisp can do that smalltalk can't?
  • From: Pascal Costanza
• Re: http://sisal.sourceforge.net/ is sisal alive at all? any lisp library do things like concurrency?
  • From: Pascal Costanza
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: joswig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Jon Harrop
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: MarkHaniford@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: SBCL/CLSQL on Mac?
  • From: Ken Tilton
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Jon Harrop
• Why is Clisp not used for comp sci at universities?
  • From: gavino
• Re: What are some things lisp can do that smalltalk can't?
  • From: gavino
• Re: comparison of objects
  • From: Barry Margolin
• http://sisal.sourceforge.net/ is sisal alive at all? any lisp library do things like concurrency?
  • From: gavino
• Re: Common Lisp from a Unix perspective - barriers to using CL
  • From: Kirk Sluder
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Pascal Costanza
• Re: comparison of objects
  • From: Pascal Costanza
• Re: What are some things lisp can do that smalltalk can't?
  • From: Pascal Costanza
• Re: Common Lisp from a Unix perspective - barriers to using CL
  • From: goose
• Re: What are some things lisp can do that smalltalk can't?
  • From: gavino
• Re: Common Lisp from a Unix perspective - barriers to using CL
  • From: Bill Atkins
• Re: Common Lisp from a Unix perspective - barriers to using CL
  • From: Bill Atkins
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Markus Triska
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Pascal Bourguignon
• Re: Common Lisp from a Unix perspective - barriers to using CL
  • From: Raffael Cavallaro
• Re: Common Lisp from a Unix perspective - barriers to using CL
  • From: Bill Atkins
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Raffael Cavallaro
• Re: SBCL/CLSQL on Mac?
  • From: Bill Atkins
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Raffael Cavallaro
• Re: comparison of objects
  • From: Bill Atkins
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Jon Harrop
• Re: comparison of objects
  • From: Pascal Bourguignon
• comparison of objects
  • From: usenet
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Pascal Bourguignon
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Jon Harrop
• Re: Syntax via macro characters.
  • From: Pillsy
• Re: Common Lisp from a Unix perspective - barriers to using CL
  • From: Ken Tilton
• Re: Syntax via macro characters.
  • From: Pillsy
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: openmosix, making computer into 1, process level, lisp
  • From: Lars Rune Nøstdal
• Re: What are some things lisp can do that smalltalk can't?
  • From: Andreas Thiele
• Re: Syntax via macro characters.
  • From: Andreas Thiele
• Re: yet another toy lisp interpreter
  • From: Greg Johnston
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Common Lisp from a Unix perspective - barriers to using CL
  • From: Pascal Bourguignon
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: hit_the_lights
• Re: Common Lisp from a Unix perspective - barriers to using CL
  • From: Kirk Sluder
• Re: SBCL/CLSQL on Mac?
  • From: Kirk Sluder
• Re: BBL and vBBL: A Biologist's Visual Programming Language for BioBike
  • From: Alex Mizrahi
• Re: lambda-returning defmacro, capture
  • From: Rob Warnock
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: joswig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: What are some things lisp can do that smalltalk can't?
  • From: wooks
• Re: openmosix, making computer into 1, process level, lisp
  • From: Alex Mizrahi
• Re: What are some things lisp can do that smalltalk can't?
  • From: Pierre THIERRY
• Re: What are some things lisp can do that smalltalk can't?
  • From: Pascal Costanza
• openmosix, making computer into 1, process level, lisp
  • From: gavino
• Re: Common Lisp from a Unix perspective - barriers to using CL
  • From: Cor Gest
• What are some things lisp can do that smalltalk can't?
  • From: gavino
• Re: Common Lisp from a Unix perspective - barriers to using CL
  • From: Bill Atkins
• Re: Pathnames (beginner issues)
  • From: Richard M Kreuter
• Re: SBCL/CLSQL on Mac?
  • From: Bill Atkins
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: MarkHaniford@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: MarkHaniford@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: SBCL/CLSQL on Mac?
  • From: quotient
• Re: Syntax via macro characters.
  • From: Pascal Bourguignon
• Re: Common Lisp from a Unix perspective - barriers to using CL
  • From: Raffael Cavallaro
• Syntax via macro characters.
  • From: Pillsy
• Re: SBCL/CLSQL on Mac?
  • From: Ken Tilton
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Pascal Bourguignon
• Re: SBCL/CLSQL on Mac?
  • From: Kirk Sluder
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: MarkHaniford@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Common Lisp from a Unix perspective - barriers to using CL
  • From: Ken Tilton
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Kirk Sluder
• Re: Common Lisp from a Unix perspective - barriers to using CL
  • From: Cor Gest
• Re: Common Lisp from a Unix perspective - barriers to using CL
  • From: Kirk Sluder
• Re: lambda-returning defmacro, capture
  • From: danmbox
• Re: position and test
  • From: Rob Warnock
• Re: lambda-returning defmacro, capture
  • From: danmbox
• yet another toy lisp interpreter
  • From: Mehmet Yavuz S. Soyturk
• Re: Peter Seibel email
  • From: Chris Parker
• Re: Common Lisp from a Unix perspective - barriers to using CL
  • From: Raffael Cavallaro
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Bob Felts
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Ken Tilton
• Re: SBCL/CLSQL on Mac?
  • From: Ken Tilton
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Pascal Bourguignon
• Re: position and test
  • From: akopa-is-very-much-like-my-address
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Ron Garret
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: André Thieme
• SBCL/CLSQL on Mac?
  • From: quotient
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Pascal Bourguignon
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Pascal Bourguignon
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Alain Picard
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: André Thieme
• Re: position and test
  • From: Pascal Bourguignon
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Bob Felts
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Ron Garret
• position and test
  • From: Matthew D Swank
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Pascal Bourguignon
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Pascal Bourguignon
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Ron Garret
• Re: Pathnames (beginner issues)
  • From: Harald Hanche-Olsen
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Bob Felts
• Re: Pathnames (beginner issues)
  • From: Pascal Bourguignon
• Re: Pathnames (beginner issues)
  • From: Harald Hanche-Olsen
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Harald Hanche-Olsen
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Pascal Bourguignon
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Ron Garret
• Re: Pathnames (beginner issues)
  • From: Pascal Bourguignon
• Re: package question
  • From: Pascal Bourguignon
• Re: Common Lisp from a Unix perspective - barriers to using CL
  • From: Greg Menke
• Re: Common Lisp from a Unix perspective - barriers to using CL
  • From: goose
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Raffael Cavallaro
• Pathnames (beginner issues)
  • From: grackle
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: MarkHaniford@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Common Lisp from a Unix perspective - barriers to using CL
  • From: Kirk Sluder
• package question
  • From: liyer . vijay
• Re: Common Lisp from a Unix perspective - barriers to using CL
  • From: Kirk Sluder
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: gpropf
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Pascal Bourguignon
• Re: lambda-returning defmacro, capture
  • From: jayessay
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Jon Harrop
• Re: Common Lisp from a Unix perspective - barriers to using CL
  • From: Pillsy
• Re: lambda-returning defmacro, capture
  • From: Pascal Bourguignon
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: André Thieme
• Re: serialization
  • From: sross
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Pascal Costanza
• Re: serialization
  • From: Alex Mizrahi
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Andrew Reilly
• Re: serialization
  • From: Lars Rune Nøstdal
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Juan R.
• serialization
  • From: Alex Mizrahi
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Common Lisp from a Unix perspective - barriers to using CL
  • From: Pascal Bourguignon
• Re: Common Lisp from a Unix perspective - barriers to using CL
  • From: Timofei Shatrov
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: David Steuber
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Chaitanya Gupta
• BBL and vBBL: A Biologist's Visual Programming Language for BioBike
  • From: JShrager@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Common Lisp from a Unix perspective - barriers to using CL
  • From: Ken Tilton
• Re: Common Lisp from a Unix perspective - barriers to using CL
  • From: Cor Gest
• Re: Common Lisp from a Unix perspective - barriers to using CL
  • From: Raffael Cavallaro
• Re: Common Lisp from a Unix perspective - barriers to using CL
  • From: Greg Menke
• Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
  • From: Raffael Cavallaro
• Re: tagged/untagged data in lisp system programming
  • From: Kaz Kylh