Re: Common Lisp from a Unix perspective - barriers to using CL
- From: Ken Tilton <kentilton@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2006 16:39:01 -0500
Robert Uhl wrote:
Ken Tilton <kentilton@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
We do not need a free Lisp and we do not need Emacs+Slime+ASDF For
Dummies, because noobs do not get that far. They just walk up to the
store window, see the shelves are bare of the libraries they just bolt
together in other languages, and keep on walking.
What's wrong with bolting together libraries? Sure, it's not creating,
but it's a useful activity. Not all are called to be library-writers;
not all are called to be library-users.
Admit it. You guys are deliberately completely misparsing natural language just to see my funny comebacks.
:)
Can somebody help Robert?
kzo
--
Algebra: http://www.tilton-technology.com/LispNycAlgebra1.htm
"Well, I've wrestled with reality for thirty-five
years, Doctor, and I'm happy to state I finally
won out over it." -- Elwood P. Dowd
"I'll say I'm losing my grip, and it feels terrific."
-- Smiling husband to scowling wife, New Yorker cartoon
.
- References:
- Common Lisp from a Unix perspective - barriers to using CL
- From: Ian Jackson
- Re: Common Lisp from a Unix perspective - barriers to using CL
- From: Ken Tilton
- Re: Common Lisp from a Unix perspective - barriers to using CL
- From: Ian Jackson
- Re: Common Lisp from a Unix perspective - barriers to using CL
- From: Ken Tilton
- Re: Common Lisp from a Unix perspective - barriers to using CL
- From: Robert Uhl
- Common Lisp from a Unix perspective - barriers to using CL
- Prev by Date: Re: Some of Ron's Code?
- Next by Date: Re: SBCL just turned 1.0!
- Previous by thread: Re: Common Lisp from a Unix perspective - barriers to using CL
- Next by thread: Re: Common Lisp from a Unix perspective - barriers to using CL
- Index(es):