Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
- From: Madhu <enometh@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 15:03:05 +0530
* Jon Harrop <45810c0d$0$8728$ed2619ec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> :
| If these things are done well in Lisp then that's great. There is still the
| problem that the userbase will be tiny, e.g. there are probably far more
| people using ML, Haskell or Mathematica pattern matchers than any given
| Lisp pattern matcher.
Why should this be a problem? Unless youre delivering advertisments to
the users or selling to them as a market..
To quote Pascal Bourguignon in <871wn6wi5i.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
who also thinks this is a `problem'
Well there are two problems with lisp.^^^^^^
[...]
1- lisp code works. So once a library is developed, there's no much
traffic, because there's no bug.
--
Madhu
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
- References:
- Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
- From: Pillsy
- Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
- From: Pillsy
- Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
- Prev by Date: Re: Chinese Characters
- Next by Date: Re: Learning Lisp?
- Previous by thread: Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
- Next by thread: Re: merits of Lisp vs Python
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|