Re: Stack overflow in relatively simple programs
- From: Dan Bensen <randomgeek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 02:19:08 -0600
>> Nothing but tail calls there. What's wrong with them?
Pascal Bourguignon wrote:
clisp doesn't on interpreted code, to ease debugging.Interesting. That sounds like the answer to the OP.
In any case, what's recursive in primes?Nothing that a simple loop can't handle. I just didn't see any obvious blunders in the code.
--
Dan
www.prairienet.org/~dsb
.
- References:
- Stack overflow in relatively simple programs
- From: robinganemccalla@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Stack overflow in relatively simple programs
- From: fairchild . anthony
- Re: Stack overflow in relatively simple programs
- From: Dan Bensen
- Re: Stack overflow in relatively simple programs
- From: Pascal Bourguignon
- Stack overflow in relatively simple programs
- Prev by Date: Re: Stack overflow in relatively simple programs
- Next by Date: Re: More questions about exported symbols and general style.
- Previous by thread: Re: Stack overflow in relatively simple programs
- Next by thread: Re: Stack overflow in relatively simple programs
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|