Re: bad-idea-p?



Pillsy wrote:
Ken Tilton wrote:


What is not open to question is the need for consistency.


Also: why the heck is it ATOM and NULL instead of ATOMP and NULLP?

Well, I kinda like the present-at-the-creation feeling I get from those inconsistencies. meanwhile, zero-p? Nah, we need to borrow back something else from scheme: zero?

Too-easy-p

kt

--
The Dalai Lama gets the same crap all the time.
-- Kenny Tilton on c.l.l when accused of immodesty
.