Re: Next Generation of Language
- From: "mark.hoemmen@xxxxxxxxx" <mark.hoemmen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 12 Jan 2007 12:41:47 -0800
Tim Bradshaw wrote:
It doesn't matter very much who moves the data, it's still cache :-).
Actually, for performance, it can help a lot (in the HPC world) if you
have software control of data movement. I can dig up some citations if
you are interested.
I would argue that a good programming language for HPC applications
would let programmers know when they are about to do something
expensive. Communication is way more expensive than arithmetic, no?
mfh
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Next Generation of Language
- From: Tim Bradshaw
- Re: Next Generation of Language
- References:
- Next Generation of Language
- From: sailormoontw@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Next Generation of Language
- From: Tim Bradshaw
- Re: Next Generation of Language
- From: mark.hoemmen@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Next Generation of Language
- From: Tim Bradshaw
- Re: Next Generation of Language
- From: George Neuner
- Re: Next Generation of Language
- From: Tim Bradshaw
- Next Generation of Language
- Prev by Date: Re: About graphics and big amounts of data.
- Next by Date: Re: Next Generation of Language
- Previous by thread: Re: Next Generation of Language
- Next by thread: Re: Next Generation of Language
- Index(es):