Re: Is there any eq t test in Common Lisp?
- From: "Matthias Benkard" <mulkiatsch@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 27 Jan 2007 12:32:01 -0800
Hi,
Indeed (typep :name T) -> T
That is generalized boolean.
Ummm... _All_ objects are instances of type T, no? What does that
prove?
Mata ne,
Matthias
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is there any eq t test in Common Lisp?
- From: Ken Tilton
- Re: Is there any eq t test in Common Lisp?
- References:
- Is there any eq t test in Common Lisp?
- From: Andreas Thiele
- Re: Is there any eq t test in Common Lisp?
- From: Tim Bradshaw
- Re: Is there any eq t test in Common Lisp?
- From: Andreas Thiele
- Re: Is there any eq t test in Common Lisp?
- From: John Thingstad
- Re: Is there any eq t test in Common Lisp?
- From: Andreas Thiele
- Re: Is there any eq t test in Common Lisp?
- From: John Thingstad
- Is there any eq t test in Common Lisp?
- Prev by Date: Re: LISP Object Oriented ?
- Next by Date: Re: Question about a problem from Little Schemer
- Previous by thread: Re: Is there any eq t test in Common Lisp?
- Next by thread: Re: Is there any eq t test in Common Lisp?
- Index(es):
