Re: Automatic parallelization - was Re: LISP Object Oriented?
- From: "Tim Bradshaw" <tfb+google@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 Jan 2007 01:43:18 -0800
On Jan 30, 8:34 am, George Neuner <gneune...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 29 Jan 2007 09:06:34 -0800, "mark.hoem...@xxxxxxxxx"
We've already got quad-core general purpose CPUs and larger n-ways on
the horizon.
We already have 8-core CPUs in general use, outside of x86, and have
had for around a year.
I think it's fairly clear that pretty much any vanilla 4-core CPU will
be starving for memory almost all the time (in particular the kinds of
things that intel and AMD will be pushing this year).
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Automatic parallelization - was Re: LISP Object Oriented?
- From: George Neuner
- Re: Automatic parallelization - was Re: LISP Object Oriented?
- References:
- Automatic parallelization - was Re: LISP Object Oriented?
- From: George Neuner
- Automatic parallelization - was Re: LISP Object Oriented?
- Prev by Date: Re: (case 'quote ('lambda 1) (otherwise 2))
- Next by Date: Re: Replacing Xaml with Lisp on Windows Vista
- Previous by thread: Automatic parallelization - was Re: LISP Object Oriented?
- Next by thread: Re: Automatic parallelization - was Re: LISP Object Oriented?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
