Re: Die, CL App Builder! Die!!! [was Re: All Your GUIs Are Belong to Us (Die, McCLIM! Die!!)]
- From: Ken Tilton <kentilton@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 16:32:12 -0500
Pillsy wrote:
Why not just CLAPP? Or does that sound too much like a social disease?
The marketing team did brainstorm that and the social disease association only recommended it. I am starting to think CL, albeit accurate, is a cowardly mistake. Lisp, say it loud, say it proud. I will never forget Franz marketing "AllegroCL...Dynamic Objects!!".
so maybe Tk Lisp? Tk-lisp? Gee, TkCL sure looks nicer.
kt
--
Well, I've wrestled with reality for 35 years, Doctor, and
I'm happy to state I finally won out over it.
-- Elwood P. Dowd
In this world, you must be oh so smart or oh so pleasant.
-- Elwood's Mom
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Die, CL App Builder! Die!!!
- From: Frank Goenninger DG1SBG
- Re: Die, CL App Builder! Die!!! [was Re: All Your GUIs Are Belong to Us (Die, McCLIM! Die!!)]
- From: C Y
- Re: Die, CL App Builder! Die!!!
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Die, CL App Builder! Die!!! [was Re: All Your GUIs Are Belong to Us (Die, McCLIM! Die!!)]
- Next by Date: Re: Automatic parallelization - was Re: LISP Object Oriented?
- Previous by thread: Re: Die, CL App Builder! Die!!! [was Re: All Your GUIs Are Belong to Us (Die, McCLIM! Die!!)]
- Next by thread: Re: Die, CL App Builder! Die!!! [was Re: All Your GUIs Are Belong to Us (Die, McCLIM! Die!!)]
- Index(es):