Re: Die, CL App Builder! Die!!!

On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:44:47 +0100, Ken Tilton <kentilton@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:



Frank Goenninger DG1SBG wrote:
Ken Tilton <kentilton@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

Pillsy wrote:


Why not just CLAPP? Or does that sound too much like a social disease?

The marketing team did brainstorm that and the social disease
association only recommended it. I am starting to think CL, albeit
accurate, is a cowardly mistake. Lisp, say it loud, say it proud. I
will never forget Franz marketing "AllegroCL...Dynamic Objects!!".

so maybe Tk Lisp? Tk-lisp? Gee, TkCL sure looks nicer.
Now, having actually spoken all of these out loud I'd vote for
TkLisp
Which -at least to me- sounds like Take Lisp. This is a strong message
- and we can say it loud and be proud. OTOH I don't want to rewrite
code and would want to keep ctk as a package nickname ;-)
'cause it can be proud of its roots, too !

Sure, the package nickname for MCL is still CCL, healthy precedent there.

Hmm, there may be a problem with all these variants: they all sound like it is a Lisp implementation.

kzo


ClimKiller? :)

--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Die, CL App Builder! Die!!!
    ... I am starting to think CL, albeit ... accurate, is a cowardly mistake. ... Lisp, say it loud, say it proud. ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)
  • Re: Die, CL App Builder! Die!!!
    ... The marketing team did brainstorm that and the social disease ... I am starting to think CL, albeit ... Lisp, say it loud, say it proud. ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)
  • Re: Die, CL App Builder! Die!!!
    ... I am starting to think CL, albeit ... accurate, is a cowardly mistake. ... Lisp, say it loud, say it proud. ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)
  • Re: OOPSLA?
    ... Are there any Lispers going to OOPSLA this year? ... albeit not primarily because of Lisp ... The DLS papers seem less than spectacularly interesting to ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)